Health care policy expert Jane Halton, AO, PSM, has been picked for her extensive experience in governmental health affairs.
Australia’s Generic Biosimilars Medicines Association (GBMA) has named health policy expert Jane Halton, AO, PSM, to chair the group in its efforts to expand access and affordable care. The GBMA is a trade association of generic and biosimilar medicine suppliers in Australia. Halton replaces Sylvain Vigneault, who has chaired the GBMA for 2 years.
Halton previously served as chair of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and co-chair of COVAX, the vaccines component of the ACT Accelerator, a global collaboration to speed up the development and production of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tests, treatments, and vaccines. She is also a former secretary of the Australian departments of Health and Finance.
In her biography with the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, a global health research center at the University of Washington, Halton is described as having extensive experience with finance, insurance, risk management, information technology, human resources, health and aging, sport, public policy, and international affairs. She is also an adjunct professor at the University of Sydney and the university of Canberra. She has previously served on the executive board of the World Health Organization.
“To return to my domestic health policy roots and lead the GBMA, at such a significantly important time for Australian patients and our vital health care community, is a challenge I am delighted to embrace,” Halton said. “As we look to the arrival of a COVID-19 vaccine for our citizens, we also need to be vigilant that all Australians continue to receive the medicines they need, when they need them.”
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.