The Therapeutic Goods Administration has announced that it will not use 4-letter suffixes in naming biologic and biosimilar medicines (as the FDA currently requires).
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia has announced that it will not use 4-letter suffixes in naming biologic and biosimilar medicines as the FDA currently requires.
The decision comes after several years of consideration and evaluation, and the adoption of different global approaches. When the time came to make a decision, the TGA considered 4 options:
TGA heard suggestions and concerns from various stakeholders in evaluating its decision. According to TGA, this decision is supported by most stakeholders. TAG’s position includes a future possible move toward adopting the EU’s barcode system, which incorporates the product code, national identification number, batch number, and expiry date.
In addition to the updated naming practice, the government also announced that its decision to strengthen AE reporting will include making the products’ brand name as well as non-proprietary name a mandatory field when reporting an AE.
The International Generic and Biosimilar medicines Association (IGBA) announced its support of the Australian Government’s decision to maintain the existing mandate for naming biologic and biosimilar medicines.
The government’s decision aligns with that of the European Union, which has approved the largest number of biosimilar medicines worldwide. The decision also aligns with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) approach to nomenclature.
The decision stands in contrast to the United States’ approach, however, whereby all biologics and biosimilars must have a 4-letter suffix, devoid of meaning, added to the end of newly approved biologics’ and biosimilars’ nonproprietary names. The first implementation of the FDA’s mandate to apply the suffix to newly approved innovator drugs came in November 2017 with the FDA approval of Roche’s Hemlibra (emicizumab-kxwh).
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.