HHS Secretary Alex Azar today testified before the Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on the Trump administration’s blueprint to lower drug prices.
HHS Secretary Alex Azar today testified before the Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on the Trump administration’s blueprint to lower drug prices.
Among the administration’s top priorities, said Azar, was creating incentives for drug makers to lower list prices for drugs. “Everybody wins when list prices rise,” he said, “except for the patient.”
Azar said that the administration’s proposal to require disclosure of list prices in direct-to-consumer advertising would be one way to achieve this goal, and he explained that HHS believes that it currently has the authority to require this change to advertising through regulation, although he would welcome congressional action to reinforce its authority in this area.
He added that another approach would include moving away from a system that permits manufacturers’ rebates and toward fixed-price contracts or value-based contracts. Azar highlighted the fact that, concurrently with his testimony, the FDA issued new guidance for industry that clarifies how drug companies can share information with payers about drugs’ effectiveness and other measures of value that can help payers to make their formulary and reimbursement decisions.
Other key concerns for the administration, said Azar, are allowing for negotiation under Medicare Part B by merging Part B with Part D, creating more competition within the pharmaceutical marketplace by publishing names of companies that restrict access to samples of drugs for generic testing and issuing new guidance on Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy requirements, and bringing down out-of-pocket costs by disallowing the use of so-called “gag clauses” that prohibit pharmacists from counseling patients on the lowest-price options for their prescribed drugs.
When asked by Senator Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, chair of the HELP Committee, which areas of the administration’s plan would require legislative action to achieve, Azar asked Congress to act to end 180-day periods of exclusivity for innovator products that could delay generic market entry, ban “gag clauses,” support site-neutral payments for drugs provided to patients, and clarify that pharmacy benefit managers must not be permitted to penalize drug manufacturers for lowering list prices.
Ahead of the hearing, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), which has been critical of the plan to move Part B coverage into Part D, issued a set of principles geared toward policy makers.
Among ACR’s key principles outlined in the document are providing access to rheumatology treatments that can control disease activity and prevent morbidity and mortality, reducing and streamlining utilization management tools that delay access to medicine, ensuring access to Medicare Part B therapies in monitored stings, promoting the use of treatment guidelines when they are available, and improving the FDA’s ability to review and manufacturers’ abilities to develop cost-saving biosimilars.
“The ACR supports drug pricing policies that make safe, effective and innovative treatments accessible to our patients at the lowest possible cost. While several proposals in the American Patients First drug pricing blueprint would bring our health care system closer to that goal, others would make it even more difficult for our patients to access the breakthrough treatments and therapies needed to prevent permanent joint damage, organ damage, and early death,” said David Daikh, MD, PhD, president of the ACR, in a statement. “In the coming weeks, the ACR will submit detailed comments to HHS sharing our feedback and concerns,” he added.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.