The office of Senator Paul (R-KY) contacted me a few weeks ago, asking how we can amend the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) to reduce the regulatory hurdles, and requested specific language to be made as part of an amendment. I provided complete details with extensive documentary support.
Image credit: Phillip - stock.adobe.com
I am pleased that on April 8, 2025, US Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) introduced legislation to streamline the approval process for biosimilars by eliminating costly and redundant clinical study requirements.1 I believe that Paul’s Expedited Access to Biosimilars Act will increase market competition, lower drug prices, and improve access to more life-saving treatments.
The bill retains the FDA’s requirement for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, but it will eliminate the FDA’s blanket requirement of immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical efficacy requirements (CES) unless scientifically warranted. Notably, the regulatory agencies in the UK and European Union (EU) have dropped the blanket requirement for these redundant studies after years of research, which determined that early-stage PK studies were sufficient for biosimilar approval.
It is worth noting that the European Medicines Agency has recently issued a policy paper suggesting what I am now suggesting for the BPCIA. I will soon be meeting with the US Senate to elaborate on the nuances of these changes to convince them that they will not jeopardize this opportunity to bring a pivotal change in health care in the US.
It is time for the agency to start thinking like an innovator, not an impediment to innovation. By modernizing and streamlining the FDA biosimilar approval process, Congress can help lower patients’ prescription costs without compromising safety or efficacy.
Last week, I was at the Festival of Biologics convention, where I presented details of this new bill. However, the Biosimilar Council representative was not enthused about it and pointed out its flaws. I am disappointed at the lack of understanding by stakeholders who should have supported my efforts to remove animal toxicology and CES, as well as support the new role of the US Pharmacopoeia I have suggested.2-4 I have published extensively and had the privilege of working with the US Senate and the White House. Despite my requests, the Biosimilar Council opted not to support these amendments. I have, therefore, decided to move on alone.
I am now asking all stakeholders to support this bill and thus ensure that we will bring biosimilar development on a rational basis that will lead us to affordable biologics soon in the US and worldwide.
References
1. Expedited Access to Biosimilars Act, S1441, 119th Cong (2025). Accessed May 5, 2025. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1414/text
2. Niazi SK. End animal testing for biosimilar approval. Science. 2022;377:162-163. doi:10.1126/science.add4664
3. Niazi SK. Scientific rationale for waiving clinical efficacy testing of biosimilars. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16:2803-2815. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S378813
4. Niazi SK. Advice to the US FDA to allow US Pharmacopeia to create biological product specifications (BPS) to remove side-by-side analytical comparisons of biosimilars with reference products. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(8):1013. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16081013
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.