Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains how the new international recognition procedure under the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) could expand biosimilar access within the United Kingdom, in his latest column.
From January 1, 2024, the EC Decision Reliance Procedure (ECDRP) has been replaced by the new international recognition procedure (IRP) that allows fast approval of products that have already received authorization for the same product from one of the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)’s specified Reference Regulators (RRs):Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Singapore, Japan, United States, and European Union. The first product approved is Xgeva/Prolia (denosumab), which has also received biosimilar approvals in the US.
To qualify for IRP submission, the product must have the same qualitative and quantitative composition (active substance(s) and excipients) and the same pharmaceutical form from applicants belonging to the same company or group of companies or ‘licensees.’
IRP can be used for chemical and biological active substances, generic applications, hybrid applications, biosimilar applications, and new fixed combination product applications. IRPs can also be used for post-authorization procedures, including line extensions, variations, and renewals.
Image credit: fotofabrika - stock.adobe.com
There are 2 recognition timetables for initial marketing authorization applications:
The MHRA has always been highly supportive of the entry of biosimilars, but its actions came into place after the United Kingdom got out of the European Union. The MHRA was the first regulatory agency to remove clinical efficacy testing of biosimilars with the following statement:
“Although each biosimilar development needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, it is considered that, in most cases, a comparative efficacy trial may not be necessary if sound scientific rationale supports this approach. Therefore, a well-argued justification for the absence of an efficacy trial should be appended to CTD Module 1 of the submitted application”.
Now, it is possible for biosimilars approved in the qualified regions to be automatically available in the United Kingdom or any other country that may decide to follow these guidelines. This action also removes many misconceptions about biosimilars, such as the need to bridge studies when the reference product is not specific to the country of origin or even conducting comparative efficacy testing. This is an opportunity for all countries listed in the IRP list to adopt the same system of qualifying the registration of biosimilars. Moreover, it is an opportunity for all developing countries to adopt this policy, as I suggested in forming a Global Regulatory Agency that is now under consideration by the United Nations.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.