Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, details his efforts to encourage congressional leaders to draft legislation that would remove interchangeability requirements and animal toxicology studies for biosimilars.
On July 14, Senator Michael Lee of Utah reintroduced his earlier bill titled the Biosimilar Red Tape Elimination Act, a follow-up to his earlier submission to remove the class of biosimilars labeled as “interchangeable biosimilar,” a classification granted upon additional switching and alternating studies with the reference product after a product had been declared as a biosimilar.
The FDA had recently exercised its decision-making to allow interchangeable status to 1 product, a ranibizumab biosimilar (Cimerli), without switching and alternating studies. The updated bill is a bipartisan bill with Senator Ben Ray Luján (D, New Mexico) joining 3 republican senators. It is noteworthy that Senator Lujan was also the first to suggest that the animal toxicology study of biosimilars should be eliminated; it was when he joined hands with other senators as The FDA Modernization Act 2.0 did.
The current Red Tape Elimination Act will render all biosimilars interchangeable unless any issues must be discussed at the committee level. It is noteworthy that both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (the United Kingdom’s equivalent of the FDA and EMA) allow interchangeability with the reference product and other biosimilars. The last part was what I had recommended to the Senator Lee team, as their advisor, to add. However, this additional language, “...and its other biosimilars,” was planned for later addition.
In supporting Senator Lee’s office, I published an intensive analysis of this issue in 2 journal articles, one to show that clinical efficacy testing of biosimilars in patients is of little value,“Scientific Rationale for Waiting Clinical Efficacy Testing, and a detailed analysis why the switching and alternating studies have no scientific rationale, as “No Two Classes of Biosimilars,”
These articles were highlighted in the press release from Senator Lee’s office. After much discussion, I realized that it is not just the science that prevails; it is as much politics. My statement quoted in the press release emphasizes that when the FDA has approved a product, it comes with an assurance that there is no “clinically meaningful” difference with its reference product. It is challenging enough to prove that a biosimilar is not different in any size clinical trial, let alone prove it again, having confirmed that there is no difference. Simple statistical modeling will show that this is not practical. I emphasized and demonstrated with convincing calculations to the senators. A simple demonstration to readers goes as follows: can you tell the difference between the same lot of a product divided into 2 groups of patients in a clinical efficacy test? The answer is yes if the testing population is infinite.
I am happy that despite much opposition, Senators Lee, Luján, as well as Mike Braun (R, Indiana) and J.D. Vance (R, Ohio) have joined hands in pushing for the approval of this bill. I am now writing to every senator and representative about the scientific demerits of such testing and to suggest that such testing is tantamount to patient abuse. I hope they will listen and vote unanimously, as they did in approving The FDA Modernization Act 2.0, which removed animal toxicology testing. Another vigil started with publishing a paper in Science magazine and distributing it to all Senators and Representatives. It worked then, and I am confident it will work again.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.