In recent paper published in Rheumatology, authors Till Uhlig, MD, and Guro L. Goll, PhD explore some of the remaining barriers to the adoption of biosimilar therapies in Europe. Physician attitudes, patient concerns, and prescribing restrictions on biologic therapies are all identified in the paper as having a role curbing uptake of biosimilars.
In recent paper published in Rheumatology, authors Till Uhlig, MD, and Guro L. Goll, PhD explore some of the remaining barriers to the adoption of biosimilar therapies in Europe. Physician attitudes, patient concerns, and prescribing restrictions on biologic therapies are all identified in the paper as having a role curbing uptake of biosimilars.
The authors point to a Web-based survey of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization, a non-profit organization comprising clinicians who treat inflammatory bowel disease, which showed that, while there existed a high level of awareness of biosimilars and their potential advantages in gastroenterology indications, only 24% of respondents pledged their faith in extrapolating a biosimilar’s indications. Furthermore, 61% said that they had little or no confidence in using biosimilars in their clinical practice. Another study (which included US and European respondents) found that only 47% of respondents believed that biosimilars were safe and effective enough for them to feel comfortable to prescribe, while 43% said that they needed more information about biosimilars.
Patients, too, continue to lack adequate education on biosimilars. The authors report that patients have concerns about pharmacovigilance, interchangeability, switching, and substitution, and that these concerns were cause for both skepticism and anxiety about using biosimilars. They also report that the switch to a biosimilar has been associated with the possibility of a nocebo effect, in which negative expectations of a therapy produce detrimental results.
Furthermore, access to biologic therapies varies across European health systems. As Sonia T. Oskouei notes in a recent contribution to The Center for Biosimilars®, government involvement, reimbursement systems, and tender procurement policies vary by nation. The authors note a correlation between higher socioeconomic status and access to biologics; specifically, 40% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe (approximately 320 million patients) face severe restrictions on their access to biologic therapies. These restrictions are primarily financial, administrative, and prescribing-related; in the 36 countries where biologics are reimbursed, clinical criteria regulate which patients may initiate treatment. In 56% of these countries, a Disease Activity Score 28 scale score (DAS28) of 3.2 or higher was a clinical requirement to initiate treatment with biologics. In 61% of these countries, patients were required to have tried more than 1 traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug before being treated with a biologic.
European nations outside the European Union generally had stricter rules for initiating biologics than were recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), the authors note, and in countries with spending limitations, early RA treatment is less likely. Additionally, cost pressure may prevent patients from receiving the most appropriate treatments.
The authors say that European prescribing practices and regulations will need to change in order to take advantage of the opportunity that biosimilar therapies provide in reducing treatment costs while reducing disparities in access to biologics.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Switching From Avastin to Bevacizumab-bvzr in CRC, NSCLC Can Reduce Medicare Costs
May 10th 2025Monthly savings from fully converting Medicare patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from reference bevacizumab to bevacizumab-bvzr could fund 13,887 and 8,959 additional patient-months of treatment, respectively, according to a cost-effectiveness study.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.