The biologics license application (BLA) seeking the approval of the on-body injector presentation of pegfilgrastim-cbqv, a biosimilar of Neulasta Onpro, has been resubmitted to the FDA for review.
The biologics license application (BLA) seeking the approval of the on-body injector (OBI) presentation of pegfilgrastim-cbqv (Udenyca), a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta), has been resubmitted to the FDA for review.1
In September 2023, the regulatory agency issued a complete response letter to the BLA due to an ongoing review of inspection findings at a third-party filler.2 No issues pertaining to the safety, efficacy, trial design, labeling, drug substance manufacturing, or device design or manufacturing were noted, and no additional data or clinical trials were requested.
The resubmission follows the completion and satisfactory resolution of the agency’s review, according to a press release issued by Coherus BioSciences, Inc., the drug developer.1
“We are pleased that resolution of the FDA’s inspection findings has enabled our rapid resubmission of the Udenyca OnBody BLA supplement,” Theresa LaVallee, PhD, chief development officer at Coherus, stated in a press release. “As the CRL identified no other issues with the BLA supplement, we look forward to working closely with the agency to complete the review of the Udenyca OnBody application in a timely manner and anticipate potential approval later this year.”
According to Amgen, sales of originator Neulasta has been declining due to the market introduction of pegfilgrastim biosimilars. However, shares of Neulasta Onpro, the OBI version of Neulasta, have been steady, achieving 58% of the pegfilgrastim market share during the second quarter of 2020.
In March 2023, the FDA approved a single-dose prefilled autoinjector presentation of pegfilgrastim-cbqv to be given the day after chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of infection as manifested by febrile neutropenia.3 The approval was based on findings included in a comprehensive analytical data package as well as a study that assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of the product.
Investigators evaluated safety findings from patients who received pegfilgrastim spanning 7 randomized clinical trials (n = 932).4 In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with metastatic or nonmetastatic breast cancer who were receiving docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 every 21 days (n = 928) were randomized to pegfilgrastim at 6 mg (n = 467) or placebo (n = 461).
These patients were between the ages of 21 years and 88 years; 99% were female and 66% were Caucasian. The most frequently experienced toxicities in the pegfilgrastim arm vs the placebo arm included bone pain (31% vs 26%) and pain in the extremity (4% vs 9%). Leukocytosis was observed in less than 1% of all patients with non-myeloid malignancies who received pegfilgrastim.
Moreover, an open-label, crossover study enrolled a total of 189 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 of 2 treatment sequences of the biosimilar: pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered via the OBI device followed by prefilled syringe administration, or the reverse, with a treatment interval of 6 to 8 weeks.5 In October 2021, it was announced that the trial met all pharmacokinetic bioequivalence primary end points and a key pharmacodynamic secondary end point of absolute neutrophil count. No new safety signals were observed.
“Coherus appreciates the great collaboration with our third-party manufacturer and the swift and comprehensive actions taken to address the inspectional issues raised by the agency,” Rich Hameister, chief technical officer at Coherus, added in the press release.1 “We are all focused on bringing this excellent product to patients as quickly as possible.”
References
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Unifying Standards: The Need for Streamlined Biosimilar Development
October 22nd 2024At the 2024 GRx+Biosims conference, industry leaders and regulatory experts underscored the urgency of unifying global standards and simplifying the biosimilar development process, sharing insights on recent advancements and the necessity for greater collaboration between manufacturers and regulatory agencies.
Phase 3 Study Reports Similar Efficacy Between SB17, Stelara in Psoriasis
October 19th 2024A phase 3, 28-week comparative clinical trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis confirmed similarity of the proposed ustekinumab biosimilar SB17 (Samsung Bioepis) to the reference product (Stelara) in efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.