Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars can significantly improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America (LA), but addressing misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance is essential for their broader adoption, according to a new study.1
The study, published in Advances in Therapy, analyzed responses from a panel of experts convened by the Americas Health Foundation (AHF) identified key steps to address these issues. In resource-limited health care settings like LA, where challenges and health disparities are significant, biosimilars could offer great benefits, but adoption has been slow.2 This lag is largely due to limited awareness and acceptance among health care stakeholders, inconsistent regulatory frameworks across the region, and insufficient pharmacovigilance systems.
The AHF convened a multidisciplinary panel of 6 biosimilar and interchangeability experts from Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico to develop guidelines for biosimilar interchangeability in LA. Using PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, the AHF conducted a comprehensive literature review of articles published between 2018 and 2023 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, prioritizing research from LA.
Panel members were assigned specific questions based on this research, provided written responses informed by the literature and their expertise, and collaboratively refined their recommendations during a 2-day virtual meeting. The resulting guidelines reflect consensus-driven evidence and expert opinions, without involving new studies on human or animal subjects.
Regional Overview
The first biosimilar regulatory pathway was established in Europe in 2005, followed by the US in 2010, with biosimilar guidelines also implemented in LA and other regions. Although Europe has achieved notable biosimilar uptake, accounting for 10% of biologics by 2021, adoption in the US and LA has been slower.
Latin America, an emerging market with diverse health care systems and regulatory environments, has made significant progress by aligning biosimilar regulations with World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. However, barriers such as limited awareness, inconsistent adherence to regulations, and weaknesses in pharmacovigilance continue to impede biosimilar uptake in the region.
Key Points About Interchangeability
In LA, most countries lack clear regulatory guidance on interchangeability, often leaving this decision to clinicians, who may not have the necessary training or access to evidence to make informed choices. In Brazil, which is the second largest public biosimilar market, the decision on interchangeability is made between the physician and patient, with no comprehensive national guidelines yet in place. Other countries, such as Chile and the Dominican Republic, require explicit physician authorization for interchangeability.
Current real-world evidence shows that switching between biosimilars and reference products carries minimal risk, with no significant difference in immunogenicity compared with batch variations of reference products. As a result, biosimilars meeting EMA or WHO standards can be considered interchangeable unless new evidence suggests otherwise. For LA, aligning with the EMA's standards for biosimilar interchangeability and limiting switches to once annually is advised to ensure pharmacovigilance and patient safety.
Recommendations From the Panel
Using the data collected, the panel made 7 main recommendations to boost biosimilar adoption in LA:
“Embracing biosimilars can significantly contribute to the sustainability of health care systems, ensuring that life-saving therapies are accessible to a larger population…. Effectively communicating these benefits to stakeholders requires clear and transparent messaging, collaboration, and reliance on real-world evidence,” the authors concluded.
References
1. Castañeda-Hernández G. Espinoza MA, Pino LE, et al. Recommendations for interchangeability in a growing biosimilar market in Latin America. Adv Ther. 2024;41(12):4357-4368. doi:10.1007/s12325-024-02990-y
2. Scheinberg M, Pineda C, Castaeda-Hernndez G, et al. Biosimilars in oncology and inflammatory diseases: current and future considerations for clinicians. MAbs. 2018;10(6):827-842. doi:10.1080/19420862.2018.1484977
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Aflibercept Biosimilar MYL-1701P Provides Equivalence in DME Therapy
November 27th 2024The study findings demonstrate that the aflibercept biosimilar MYL-1701P is as effective and safe as the reference aflibercept in treating diabetic macular edema (DME), offering a promising option for reducing treatment costs and improving global access to care for patients with DME.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Omalizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy as Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
November 26th 2024The phase 3 trial (NCT04966338) found that a biosimilar ocrelizumab candidate (Xacrel) was equivalent to Ocrevus in reducing the annualized relapse rate and showed comparable safety and efficacy in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis over 96 weeks.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.