During this week’s annual meeting of American Society of Hematology, researchers from Canada reported that using biosimilar filgrastim could result in substantial savings.
The role of biosimilars in Canadian healthcare systems has been increasingly in the spotlight in recent months, with an advisory council recommending biosimilar use as a way to achieve universal public coverage for pharmaceuticals, but with some patient groups—and reference product sponsors—opposing provincial switching programs that seek to transition patients to biosimilar products.
It is in this milieu that, during this week’s annual meeting of American Society of Hematology, researchers from Canada reported that using biosimilar filgrastim could result in substantial savings. The study, conducted by researchers from the University of Saskatchewan and the University of Alberta, focused on the Health Canada—approved biosimilar Grastofil, made by Apotex, which was introduced in Canada in 2016.
In a retrospective analysis of IQVIA data on Canadian drug purchases from 2016 to 2018, the investigators stratified samples by region, market size, and center type, and calculated cost savings on a quarterly basis by province.
They found that, during the period studied, the biosimilar accounted for 27% of filgrastim purchases, and a total of $62,061,576 (USD $47,127,078) in spending, while the brand-name filgrastim, Neupogen, accounted for $204,152,590 (USD $155,025,310). Biosimilar use therefore generated $13,443,873 (USD $10,208,739) in savings, but could have generated $36,348,476 (USD $27,601,578) had the biosimilar been used in 100% of cases.
The researchers note that the overall percentage of biosimilar filgrastim used in each Canadian province varied widely; market share for the biosimilar was as low as 0.08% in Nova Scotia and as high as 81.62% in Saskatchewan. In the largest Canadian province, Ontario, the biosimilar represented 44.7% of filgrastim use during the study period.
According to the authors, using biosimilars is an opportunity to save money in an overextended healthcare system, and while using Grastofil did generate some savings, increased biosimilar use will produce greater financial benefits.
Reference
Bhimji H, Eurich D, Mansell K, Mansell H. Potential and realized cost savings with the use of the biosimilar Grastofil vs Neupogen. Presented at: The 61th Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology; December 7-10, 2019; Orlando, FL. Abstract 2126.
Survey of Clinicians: Lower Cost of Biosimilars Is the Main Driver of Treatment Choice in IBD
September 7th 2024Researchers surveyed clinicians from 63 countries and found that adalimumab and infliximab biosimilars, primarily chosen for their lower cost, are widely available and have improved access to biologic treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
AI and Biosimilars: Bridging Global Health Disparities and Enhancing Treatment Efficiency
August 10th 2024Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies can support global health systems in integrating biosimilars into care models, reducing health care costs, enhancing treatment decision-making strategies, and narrowing the gap between high-income and low- and middle-income countries.