In part 1 of this interview, Cate Lockhart, executive director of the Biologics and Biosimilar Collective Intelligence Consortium, details some of her expectations for further growth of the US biosimilar market.
The Center for Biosimilars® recently spoke with Cate Lockhart, PharmD, PhD, executive director of the Biologics and Biosimilar Collective Intelligence Consortium, about the infliximab market, the pipeline of biosimilar products on the horizon, and the need for more real world evidence.
In the interview, Lockhart talks about how infliximab biosimilars have seen tepid acceptance in the United States compared with other countries, achieving only 7% uptake despite being some of the first biosimilars on the US market.
Although she said it’s unclear what would change the game for infliximab biosimilars, she noted that other biosimilars have achieved higher usage, suggesting that more broader uptake overall will become the standard trend.
She also discussed the biosimilars pipeline that currently has more than 70 potential products. Lockhart said slow uptake for infliximab biosimilars might have discouraged some companies from pursuing biosimilars, but seeing how robust the pipeline currently is makes her hopeful that more candidates will receive FDA approval, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to wind down in the United States.
Lockhart also explained how more real world evidence on use of biosimilars could help alleviate persuade more physicians to prescribe these products. She added that policy guidances can be ambiguous and that real world evidence can play an important role in informing decision makers.
Additionally, Lockhart said that real world evidence could provide payers an alternative evidence source to traditional clinical trials, enabling them to feel more comfortable with biosimilars and better inform their formulary decision making.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Similar Persistence Rates Between Adalimumab New Starts, Switched Patients
December 7th 2024A French real-world study found that the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 was effective in treating rheumatic or gastrointestinal immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, showing no loss of disease control in switched patients and similar persistence rates between naive and switched groups.
Cost and Efficacy Insights on Infliximab Biosimilars in Pediatric Uveitis
December 3rd 2024The study highlights the safety, efficacy, and cost benefits of infliximab biosimilars in managing pediatric noninfectious uveitis, showing fewer disease flares and reduced costs compared with reference infliximab, as well as the influence of insurance mandates on treatment decisions.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.