Regulators in China have approved the country’s first ever biosimilar, a rituximab product referencing Rituxan. The product, HLX01, was developed by Henlius and will be primarily used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Regulatory requirements that were applied in the analysis of the drug, say investigators who took part in its development, will set a precedent for analytical similarity assessments of biosimilars in China going forward.
Regulators in China have approved the country’s first ever biosimilar, a rituximab product referencing Rituxan. The product, HLX01, was developed by Henlius, and will be primarily used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
China’s regulatory agency created national guidelines for developing and evaluating biosimilars in 2015, with principles and requirements consistent with those used by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency. While China currently has a bevy of biosimilars undergoing research (with approximately 200 biosimilar clinical trial applications approved to date), the rituximab product is the first to earn the regulator’s clearance.
Approval of HLX01 was based on a data package that included a 3-way similarity assessment of 12 batches of the biosimilar, 15 batches of Chinese-licensed reference rituximab (which is manufactured in Germany and then packaged, labeled, and sold in China), and 7 batches of EU-licensed rituximab. A report on this assessment was published last week in mAbs.1
The primary structure of the rituximab molecules was investigated using intact, reduced, and deglycosylated mass analyses; reduced peptide mapping; measurement of free thiol groups; and disulfide linkage mapping. The molecules were found to have highly similar primary structures. Higher-order structures were also characterized using multiple techniques, all of which revealed the higher-order structure of the biosimilar to be highly similar to those of the 2 reference products.
An assessment of charge variants showed that the biosimilar has a similar charge variant profile compared with both reference rituximabs, with the exception of a slightly higher level of basic variants representing more unprocessed heavy chain C-terminal lysine, which does not affect the efficacy or safety of an antibody product.
The biosimilar also demonstrated the same levels of purity as the reference rituximab products and was found to possess slightly lower levels of aggregates and fragments than the reference products.
HLX01 was also shown to have the same glycosylation site, occupancy, and glycans as the reference rituximab products. The relative G0F content was higher in HLX01, resulting in lower relative content of galactose-contained glycans versus the reference rituximab products. The investigators write that the difference in galactose, however, would not cause notable changes in the molecules’ activities.
Biological functions of the biosimilar, including antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, Fc receptor binding, CD20 binding, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and apoptosis were similar to those of the reference products for all tested batches.
HLX01 and its reference products also demonstrated good stability and consistent degradation behaviors under forced degradation conditions.
Taken together, write the investigators, these data show that HLX01 is highly similar to both the Chinese- and EU-licensed rituximab reference products. Furthermore, they write, the regulatory requirements that were applied in the analysis of HLX01 will set a precedent for analytical similarity assessments of biosimilars in China going forward.
Reference
1. Xu Y, Xie L, Zhang E, et al. Physicochemical and functional assessments demonstrating analytical similarity between rituximab biosimilar HLX01 and the MabThera [published online February 22, 2019]. mAbs. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2019.1578147.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
BioRationality: FDA Clarification Provides New Indications and Process Change for Biosimilars
September 9th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains the FDA's new guidelines on post-approval changes for biosimilars, emphasizing the processes for reporting modifications, comparability assessments, and the potential for biosimilars to introduce new indications or formulation changes, which could significantly impact their market competitiveness and accessibility.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: FDA Opens Up Biosimilar Inquiries on Reddit
August 26th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, urges stakeholders to engage with the FDA on its Reddit forum—where a representative will answer complex biosimilar questions—encourages clearing misconceptions, and advocates for updates to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act guidelines.
Eye on Pharma: Celltrion, Costco Partnership; Amgen Sues Samsung Bioepis; Denosumab Results
August 21st 2024Celltrion's adalimumab-aaty biosimilar is now accessible for all Costco members, while Amgen sues Samsung Bioepis over the latter’s denosumab biosimilar candidate, and GlycoNex progresses its denosumab biosimilar SPD8 to phase 3 trials.