Step therapy, which requires that patients try the payer’s preferred treatment before the one a physician recommends, jeopardizes the health of patients with cancer by delaying treatment and creating unnecessary barriers, according to a recent position statement from the Community Oncology Alliance (COA).
Step therapy, which requires that patients try the payer’s preferred treatment before the one a physician recommends, jeopardizes the health of patients with cancer by delaying treatment and creating unnecessary barriers, according to a recent position statement from the Community Oncology Alliance (COA).
Step therapy, or so-called “fail-first” policies, are common in chronic conditions such as for autoimmune disorders or diabetes, but for patients with cancer who may not have the luxury of time, it can create unnecessary delays or denials; COA said that, unlike some other conditions, with cancer “the wrong choice as initial therapy can be life-threatening.” In addition, there are few therapeutic and generic-to-brand substitutes in oncology treatments, COA said.
“Patients on fail-first step therapy are forced to receive potentially inferior or incorrect treatment options that their treating physicians considered and specifically did not prescribe,” COA said.
COA called insurers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) “third-party middlemen” and said step therapy “forces patients and their physicians to try cheaper, often older, treatments before they are allowed access to state-of-the-art, newer therapies, which are often more expensive. This is despite the recommendation of the treating physician who believes the cheaper treatment would not work.”
Although plans include an appeal process in step therapy programs, they are insufficient, COA said, because step therapy stops patients from receiving evidence-based treatment and presents burdensome hurdles to patients and providers.
While step therapy is common in commercial insurance, it became part of HHS’ strategy to control costs this year when Medicare Advantage began allowing it as well. A bipartisan group of senators recently introduced a bill to curb the use of step therapy.
Instead of focusing on medical needs, the goal of step therapy is to zero in on financial interests to maximize profits and control costs, COA said. Some reports have cited step therapy as a way to increase uptake of biosimilars; earlier this year, COA released a position statement about biosimilars, saying it would work with stakeholders to support the acceptance of biosimilars as well as work to close knowledge gaps.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Switching From Avastin to Bevacizumab-bvzr in CRC, NSCLC Can Reduce Medicare Costs
May 10th 2025Monthly savings from fully converting Medicare patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from reference bevacizumab to bevacizumab-bvzr could fund 13,887 and 8,959 additional patient-months of treatment, respectively, according to a cost-effectiveness study.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.