A new research report from Milliman, commissioned by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), found that fewer than half of patients with blood cancer received treatment within 3 months of diagnosis, and LLS says that costs may be keeping patients from getting care.
A new research report from Milliman, commissioned by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), found that fewer than half of patients with blood cancer received treatment within 3 months of diagnosis, and LLS says that costs may be keeping patients from getting care.
The report used CMS data and Medicare Advantage (MA) data to identify patients with newly diagnosed blood cancers, including acute leukemia, chronic leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and bone marrow disorders. The researchers identified 35,877 patients who were fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries, and 1898 who had MA plans with Part D coverage (MAPD).
The data showed that, for patients newly diagnosed with blood cancer, only 45% of the MAPD population and 41% of the FFS population received active treatment for their blood cancer within 90 days of their diagnosis. The lowest rates of active treatment were among patients with bone marrow disorders (15% in MAPD and 19% in FFS), while rates were higher among those with multiple myeloma (58% in MAPD and 59% in FFS).
A key driver of spending in blood cancer is anticancer therapy; anticancer products were responsible for 53% ($72,692) of FFS and 55% ($64,968) of MAPD average allowed spending in the first year after diagnosis, and spending in Part B was significantly higher than in Part D in the first year, at $53,524 versus $19,167 (FFS) and $49,375 versus $15,593 (MAPD) average allowed spending.
Those costs also drove high out-of-pocket (OOP) responsibilities for patients; among those patients who did receive active treatment for their cancer, average OOP costs for years 1 and 2 were $17,084 and $8,295, respectively, for FFS patients and $6,896 and $2,603, respectively, for MAPD patients. Some patients had even higher costs; at the 90th percentile for patients with chronic leukemia, FFS patients had average OOP costs of $14,899 in Part B and $10,076 in Part D, and MAPD patients had average OOP costs of $8,942 in Part B and $2,652 in Part D.
Compounding the problem of high OOP spending for FFS beneficiaries is the fact that supplemental insurance, Medigap, can be refused in most states to patients with pre-existing conditions, including cancer.
Taken together, says the LLS, these findings suggest that cost may be a key factor in patients’ decisions to delay or even forego care.
“In addition to the emotional impact of dealing with a blood cancer, patients and families often face extraordinary costs in the first year after diagnosis and beyond,” says Louis J. DeGennaro, PhD, president and chief executive officer of LLS. “The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society hopes that the findings from this new study will prompt payers, providers, patient advocates and policymakers to work together to address the financial burdens for patients.”
LLS urges patients to consider their options closely during the Medicare open enrollment period, which closes on December 7. If enrollees have or expect to have high costs, they may benefit from an MA plan with options that feature OOP caps.
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Study: Biosimilar Use, Dose Rounding Produce More Cost Savings Than Either Strategy Alone
November 18th 2023A retrospective study of New England patients receiving trastuzumab or bevacizumab found that combining dose rounding and biosimilar use resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone.
Part 3: Study Questions Usefulness of Clinical Efficacy Trials for Oncology Biosimilars in Europe
November 16th 2023In part 3 of a 3-part series for Global Biosimilars Week, The Center for Biosimilars® reviews an analysis investigating whether clinical efficacy studies have an impact on prescribing decisions for oncology biosimilars across Europe.