On Monday, March 26, a Delaware court judge granted Coherus Biosciences’ motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Amgen over alleged infringement of a patent covering pegfilgrastim (Neulasta).
On Monday, March 26, a Delaware court judge granted Coherus Biosciences’ motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Amgen over alleged infringement of a patent covering pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted.
The patent in question, US patent 8,273,707, is directed to a process for purifying proteins during which 2 specific salts are used in a loading solution, and Amgen claimed that Coherus infringed on the patent when it submitted an abbreviated Biologics License Application (aBLA) for its as-yet unapproved pegfilgrastim biosimilar, CHS-1701.
According to the court, Amgen previously acknowledged that Coherus did not “literally infringe” on the patent, although Coherus’ preparation process mixed salts that, in combinations, were equivalent to Amgen’s patented combinations.
Amgen argued that dismissal of the case was premature because there remained factual disputes, but according to the court, “the facts in the prosecution history here are undisputed,” and Amgen “merely disputes the interpretation of those facts.”
Amgen initially filed the suit after the parties completed the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act “patent dance,” and agreed that the patent would be subject to an immediate infringement action. Amgen argued that it did not have an adequate remedy at law, and that it was entitled to injunctive relief to prevent Coherus from any further infringement of its patent.
Dismissal of the suit is a step forward for Coherus, which announced earlier this month that it is close to resubmitting its aBLA for the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar. It hopes to launch the biosimilar by mid-2018.
In June of last year, the company received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA, in which the agency asked Coherus to perform a reanalysis of a subset of samples with a revised immunogenicity assay and to provide additional manufacturing-related process information. The FDA did not request a clinical study of CHS-1701 in oncology patients, however, and did not indicate that additional process qualification lots would be necessary. Coherus says that it also hopes to receive approval for the drug from the European Medicines Agency in the second half of this year.
The Role of Coverage Strategies in Biosimilar Market Impact and Cost Savings
September 4th 2024A recent study highlights that although biosimilars have led to significant price reductions, originator products with sole preferred coverage strategies have maintained market share, suggesting that increased biosimilar uptake alone may not fully leverage the market's competitive and cost-saving potential.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Eye on Pharma: Celltrion, Costco Partnership; Amgen Sues Samsung Bioepis; Denosumab Results
August 21st 2024Celltrion's adalimumab-aaty biosimilar is now accessible for all Costco members, while Amgen sues Samsung Bioepis over the latter’s denosumab biosimilar candidate, and GlycoNex progresses its denosumab biosimilar SPD8 to phase 3 trials.
CMS Announces New Drug Prices Under the IRA, Including for Stelara and Enbrel
August 19th 2024CMS announced negotiated prices for 10 drugs under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), sparking mixed reactions, with concerns that including drugs facing imminent biosimilar competition could hinder market access to lower-cost alternatives.