The White House confirmed last week that it will continue to make cost-sharing reduction (CSR) payments for the month of August. The Trump administration has been making decisions on whether to continue to fund CSRs on a monthly basis, and had previously suggested that it might soon put an end to CSRs.
The White House confirmed last week that it will continue to make cost-sharing reduction (CSR) payments for the month of August. The Trump administration has been making decisions on whether to continue to fund CSRs on a monthly basis, and had previously suggested that it might soon put an end to CSRs.
CSR payments, which provide extra financial assistance to help consumers who make from 100% to 250% of the poverty line cover co-payments and deductibles, are paid in the form of subsidies to insurance companies, and are provided for in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that terminating CSR payments would increase the federal deficit by $194 billion through 2026. Because tax subsidies would increase as premiums for silver plans increase, the average subsidy per person would be greater, and more individuals would receive such subsidies. Additionally, the CBO said that cutting off CSR payments could trigger a withdrawal of insurers from some states because of “substantial uncertainty about the effects of the policy” on individuals purchasing plans.
The Kaiser Family Foundation has indicated that, based upon preliminary insurer rate filings, insurers are already beginning such withdrawals; the Foundation reports that Ohio’s Paulding County is expected to have no insurers in 2018 after Anthem—with its selection of 334 plans—exits. If no other insurer enters the local ACA marketplace, residents of Paulding County will not be able to purchase plans that qualify for federal subsidies.
Fourteen counties in Nevada faced a similar challenge after Anthem’s announcement of its withdrawal from the Nevada ACA market, but, as Inside Health Policy reports, a new insurer has stepped in to provide coverage. Nevada Governor Brian Sandovol (R) said that Centene will cover the 14 counties—which are home to approximately 8000 people—that would have been left without coverage in the wake of Anthem’s exit. Centene had previously planned to expand into 3 of the counties.
“It was unacceptable to me to have something like this,” Sandovol said. “It was frustrating and embarrassing for the state of Nevada to not have coverage in those areas.”
As state leaders attempt to secure coverage for their residents, bipartisan efforts to stabilize the ACA markets are underway in the Senate. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tennessee), who also led bipartisan efforts to pass the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017, and Senator Patty Murray (D-Washington) yesterday announced the first 2 hearings before the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on stabilizing premiums in the ACA insurance market. The meetings, scheduled for September 6 and September 7, will include testimony from state insurance commissioners and governors.
Lamar said, “Any solution that Congress passes for a 2018 stabilization package will have to be small, bipartisan and balanced. It should give states more flexibility in approving insurance policies…as well as fund the [CSR] payments to help stabilize premiums for 2018. I look forward to finishing our work by the end of September in time to have an effect on the health insurance policies sold in 2018.”
Murray added that she hoped “that we can act quickly and in a responsible manner that builds upon our efforts to make health care more affordable, accessible, and higher quality for all.”
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.