The rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 (Celltrion and Teva’s Truxima), which is approved in the European Union and under review by the FDA in the United States, showed comparable effectiveness to reference rituximab (Genentech and Biogen’s innovator product, sold as Mabthera and Rituxan) in a network meta-analysis.
The rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 (Celltrion and Teva’s Truxima), which is approved in the European Union and under review by the FDA in the United States, showed comparable effectiveness to reference rituximab (Genentech and Biogen’s innovator product, sold as Mabthera and Rituxan) in a network meta-analysis conducted by Marco Chiumente, PharmD, and colleagues, which was published in the September 2017 issue of Haematologica. Network meta-analysis is increasingly used because of its ability to compare 3 or more treatments with one another—a feature particularly helpful for studying biosimilars, the authors note.
A recent European Public Assessment Report by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that assessed CT-P10 was used as the basis for the authors’ network meta-analysis, which included an equivalence study comparing CT-P10 versus the originator rituximab in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (AFL) as well as a randomized clinical trial comparing the originator rituximab versus the standard of care (SOC). The SOC included chemotherapy regimens that are commonly recommended in AFL, such as cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP).
There were 1704 evaluable patients in the meta-analysis. The study’s endpoint was the rate of overall response at the end of the prescribed regimens, a composite of complete response, unconfirmed complete response, and partial response. The network meta-analysis was based on the Bayesian method proposed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and estimated odds ratio (OR) for all pairwise comparisons, along with ranking histogram and 95% credible intervals (CrI).
The authors found an OR of:
In terms of efficacy, CT-P10 ranked as follows:
Originator rituximab ranked as follows:
The SOC always ranked third.
The 95% CrI estimated by the Bayesian meta-analysis for the comparison of biosimilar versus originator (OR = 2.61; 95% CrI, 0.51 to 14.91) was close to the 95% confidence interval (CI) reported in the equivalence trial (OR = 2.56; 95% CI, 0.48 to 14.28). “Hence, the results of our network meta-analysis concerning this comparison (together with their variability) confirmed those found in the equivalence trial,” the authors conclude. “The results of our meta-analysis confirm the efficacy of rituximab biosimilar in treating AFL.” They further point out that the biosimilar ranked first in 88% of the Bayesian simulations.
“Using CT-P10 in patients with AFL has a critical clinical relevance because, at least in Europe, this is the first case in which a biosimilar has been proposed for a potentially curative indication in oncologic patients,” the researchers conclude. Globally, national healthcare systems are spending approximately $100 billion per year for anticancer drugs alone. Researchers continue to study biosimilars’ efficacy and safety compared with originator drugs because using biosimilars can reduce the costs of cancer treatments and increase accessibility to these important treatments. The authors conclude that, if physicians are to consider using biosimilars, it is important to confirm their comparability in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, preclinical biological activity, and physiochemical characterization, and also critical to require a robust and consistent manufacturing process.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Achieving PFS in Advanced Gastric Cancer With HLX02 Biosimilar, Chemotherapy
November 23rd 2024In a phase 2 study, the addition of HLX22, an anti-HER2 antibody, to HLX02 biosimilar and XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) chemotherapy extended progression-free survival (PFS) in untreated HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer patients.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Eye on Pharma: Henlius, Organon Updates; Meitheal Portfolio Expansion; Celltrion Zymfentra Data
November 5th 2024Henlius and Organon’s pertuzumab biosimilar met phase 3 goals; Meitheal expanded its US biosimilars; Celltrion’s subcutaneous infliximab (Zymfentra) showed monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.
Samsung Bioepis Report Showcases Adalimumab Biosimilar Growth in Market Share
October 11th 2024Adalimumab biosimilars have seen a significant increase in market share, from 2% in early 2024 to 22%, as payers and pharmacy benefit managers begin to prioritize these biosimilars over the reference product, Humira.