In an effort to accurately predict an individual patient’s response after starting or tapering an anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent, researchers from the Netherlands, reporting findings in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, explain that calprotectin has some predictive value for clinical response in patients starting anti-TNF treatment, although it was not predictive of clinical response after tapering.
While anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), not all patients will achieve a good clinical response after 6 months of treatment. Furthermore, while some responders can taper their doses of these agents, not all patients are able to so.
In an effort to accurately predict an individual patient’s response after starting or tapering an anti-TNF agent, researchers from the Netherlands, reporting findings in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, explain that calprotectin has some predictive value for clinical response in patients starting anti-TNF treatment, although it was not predictive of clinical response after tapering.
The researchers obtained baseline serum samples and clinical outcomes of patients with RA who initiated treatment with adalimumab or etanercept by using the Biologic Individual Optimised Treatment Outcome Prediction study, a prospective longitudinal prediction study of patients with RA 18 years or older. Additional data were collected from patients in the dose tapering arm of the Dose Reduction Strategies of Subcutaneous TNF Inhibitors study, which investigated noninferiority of dose reduction in patients stable on adalimumab or etanercept.
Baseline and 6-month serum samples were available for 50 patients initiating adalimumab and 75 patients initiating etanercept. Additionally, 102 patients randomized to taper their dose of adalimumab (n = 38) or etanercept (n = 64) had baseline serum samples available.
In the prospective study, calprotectin levels were weakly to moderately significantly correlated with a disease activity score counted in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), (R = .32; P <.001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (R = .41; P <.001), and CRP (R = .57; P <.001) at baseline. In the tapering study, calprotectin levels were significantly correlated with CRP (R = .21; P = .03) only.
At 6 months, 50 (40%) of the patients who initiated treatment achieved a good response, measured by European League Against Rheumatism criteria, and baseline calprotectin levels were higher in responders, at 985 ng/mL (range, 558 ng/mL to 1417 ng/mL), than in nonresponders, at 645 ng/mL (range, 415 ng/mL to 973 ng/mL).
Among those who tapered, 47 patients (46%) successfully reduced their dose, 19 (19%) successfully discontinued anti-TNF treatment, and 36 (35%) were unsuccessful at tapering. Calprotectin levels at baseline were similar among all 3 groups.
According to the authors, serum calprotectin has some value for predicting clinical response to anti-TNF agents, although it does not have added value to other clinical factors already used, and it is not a useful predictor for clinical response after tapering therapy.
Reference
Tweehuysen L, den Broeder N, van Herwaarden N. Predictive value of serum calprotectin (S100A8/A9) for clinical response after starting or tapering anti-TNF treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2018;4(1):e000654.
What Clinicians Need to Know About Using Biosimilars to Treat IBD
April 13th 2024A review article, intended to act as a guide for clinicians, summarizes the available infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as others that are coming down the pipeline.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Study: More Biosimilar Competition Is Not Lowering Patient OOP Costs
March 29th 2024Despite more biosimilars entering the market and generating significant savings for payers and health care systems, these savings are not resulting in lower out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for patients, according to a recent study.
Pipelines and Preparation: How the US Can Prepare for More RA Biosimilars
April 16th 2023What can practices do to prepare for all the biosimilars to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coming down the pipeline? And how can they ensure that the lower-than-anticipated adoption rates for infliximab biosimilars are not repeated? Robert Zutaut, RPh, from McKesson Provider Solutions, tackles all this and more on this episode of Not So Different.
The Role of Biosimilars: Advancing Access, Financial Health, and System Sustainability
March 11th 2024Kashyap Patel, MD, CEO of Carolina Blood and Cancer Care, a member of the Community Oncology Alliance, and member of The Center for Biosimilars® Advisory Board, glances back at the development of the biosimilar industry and the last 5 years of progress.