In June, the American Medical Association's (AMA) president Barbara L. McAneny, MD, outlined the group’s concerns during a hearing held by the California Department of Insurance stating that “The AMA has come to the conclusion that this merger would likely substantially lessen competition in many healthcare markets, to the detriment of patients,” and therefore should be blocked.
Earlier this week the Department of Justice (DOJ) cleared the $69 billion merger between CVS and Aetna, with some conditions.
In order to approve the merger, the DOJ required Aetna to sell off its Medicare Part D business, worth $2.2 million, as CVS already has its own Part D business under its “SilverScript” brand. Antitrust regulators stated that this would “fully resolve the departments anticompetitive concerns,” and, in agreement, Aetna will sell off its Part D business to WellCare.
“The divestitures required here allow for the creation of an integrated pharmacy and health benefits company that has the potential to generate benefits by improving the quality and lowering the costs of the healthcare services that American consumers can obtain,” said assistant attorney general Makan Delrahim of the Justice Department’s AntiTrust Division in a statement.
Without the divestiture, DOJ attorneys argued that the combined company would have anticompetitive effects, increased prices, and inferior customer service, specifically in the states where Aetna previously sold Part D plans.
“DOJ clearance is an important step toward bringing together the strengths and capabilities of our two companies to improve the consumer healthcare experience. We are pleased to have reached an agreement with the DOJ that maintains the strategic benefits and value creation potential of our combination with Aetna,” said CVS Health president and CEO, Larry J. Merlo in a statement.
However, notable industry members such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Antitrust Institute (AAI) have spoken out against the merger and called for the DOJ to block the transaction prior to its announcement this week.
In June, AMA president Barbara L. McAneny, MD, outlined the group’s concerns during a hearing held by the California Department of Insurance stating that “The AMA has come to the conclusion that this merger would likely substantially lessen competition in many healthcare markets, to the detriment of patients,” and therefore should be blocked.
While part of the AMA’s concern was resolved with the DOJ requirement that Aetna sell off its Part D business, other factors remain such as the anticompetitive effects the merger would have on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) services, health insurance, retail pharmacy, and specialty pharmacy. AAI echoed these concerns citing its belief that 3 integrated PBM-insurer systems would dominate the marketplace and effectively lock out competition.
Going forward, CVS and Aetna are working to complete the remaining state reviews, and CVS believes the merger is on track to be completed in the early part of this quarter.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.