Fran Gregory, PharmD, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, discusses what the future biosimilars marketplace may look like compared with generics and reference products at Asembia 2023.
Although a "generic-like" model may be preferable to stakeholders, the United States has a long way to go to get the biosimilars market to reach that point, says Fran Gregory, PharmD, vice president of emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, at Asembia 2023.
Transcript
Will the biosimilars space evolve into a more "generic-like" marketplace or will beiosimilars behave more like reference products?
Yeah, that's a really good question too! Right now, we are seeing biosimilars behave a little bit more like reference products. We're seeing them being treated differently on formularies. We're seeing them come to market with slight variations.
The adalimumab biosimilars are a great example of why they're not exactly like generics. There's variability in biologics in general. So, of course, there's variability in biosimilars. Not only is there innate variability, there's also some slight differences in some of the makeup of these products.
For example, with adalimumab, we have citrate-containing and we have citrate-free, we have high-concentration, we have low-concentration, we have different administrative devices that patients might view as better than others. So, there are a few things that are different about biosimilars and biologics in general that aren't present when we think about simple molecule generics that are all exactly the same.
While we would like biosimilars to look more like generics eventually, there are several things that we kind of have to evolve to get to that place.
I think that the FDA designation for interchangeable biosimilars is, to many people, confusing and somewhat unnecessary. And, we always hear it said that interchangeability of a biosimilar is a regulatory concern, not a clinical concern.
The fact of being approved by the FDA as a biosimilar in every other country in the world means it's an interchangeable biosimilar and it can be substituted for a reference product.
The United States is not there yet, on that piece as well. While I would love to say we're ready to really have a generic like model—I think that would be so much easier for all stakeholders—we're just not quite there in the US yet. There would have to be a lot of changes to policy, a lot of changes to the FDA approval processes and pathways, and we have a long way to go in that regard.
AMCP Posters Tackle Interchangeability and Medicaid, Factors Driving Biosimilar Access
April 24th 2024Two posters from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) annual meeting explore how an interchangeable insulin glargine biosimilar plays into Medicaid budgets and the top factors driving access to biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
The 6 Key Policy Factors to Ensure Biosimilar Market Sustainability
April 16th 2024Magnus Bodin, senior director and head of international access and policy at Biogen, presented warning signs for unsustainable biosimilar markets as well as key factors needed to create effective policies and future-proof biosimilar markets globally.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Study: More Biosimilar Competition Is Not Lowering Patient OOP Costs
March 29th 2024Despite more biosimilars entering the market and generating significant savings for payers and health care systems, these savings are not resulting in lower out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for patients, according to a recent study.