Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA, from Emory Healthcare and Winship Cancer Institute, explains how stakeholders may view the economic value of biosimilars differently based on their goals and his predictions for how biosimilar utilization will develop in the future.
Transcript
How has the economic value of oncology biosimilars changed over time and how do the economic benefits differ between stakeholders?
Haumschild: I think the economic values continue to grow. We've seen from our European colleagues that they've been able to uptake these medications sooner and really reduce cost. And I think that's what a lot of us are interested in—how do we preserve efficacy and reduce cost? So, I think the economic benefits can continue to grow.
But it is different depending on the different stakeholder. So, from our payer colleagues, they are looking at rebating and getting the total cost of care down on their end by larger rebates and preferencing therapy. Whereas, on the hospital side, we're also looking at uptake of biosimilars to reduce the cost of care and still provide efficacious options. I think it's going to be interesting, though, in the future as more agents come forward, and the rebating continues, and how does that degrade the average sales price for the health systems, where it still provides economic value, and it'll be more interesting of how it impacts reimbursement moving forward.
What utilization trends have you observed and what are your predictions for how the oncology biosimilar space will evolve going forward?
Haumschild: Utilization is continuing to grow. I think that's something that we're excited about. And as we see more therapies come into the market, I think people are starting to recognize that having an adoption strategy is important. I think with that adoption strategy, people are becoming smarter in the way that they're building out their electronic medical records, deciding to designate policies in order to provide a better uptake and faster uptake. And I think at the same time, as payer colleagues are to preference biosimilars, we see it to grow. So, that being said, I know we have a lot of market approvals coming up in the next few years. I personally am really excited, and I think this will, in turn, create larger utilization and cost savings across the country and actually reduce the amount of spend in the US directly related to biosimilars.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.