Early treatment with a biosimilar agent increased total costs by £70 (US $89) per patient versus standard intervention.
In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), early treatment with biologics can have substantial benefits; anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, for example, increase the likelihood of remission and slow radiographic progression. The cost of biologics, however, means that many patients lack access to these agents.
In a newly published paper, a team of authors sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of early treatment with biologics—either reference or biosimilar—in patients who do not respond adequately to conventional drugs.
Using a Markov model to estimate lifetime patient costs, the researchers compared standard intervention (adding an anti-TNF agent to methotrexate after 12 months) with 2 early intervention options (adding an anti-TNF reference at 6 months or adding an anti-TNF biosimilar at 6 months).
Adding a reference anti-TNF agent after 6 month of methotrexate increased costs by £4701 (US $5978) per patient versus the standard intervention but decreased lifetime direct costs (such as medical costs) and indirect costs (such as loss of work productivity) by £3008 (US $3826) per patient. Overall, this intervention yielded a net cost increase of £1692 (US $2151) per patient.
Adding a biosimilar anti-TNF agent resulted in the same changes in lifetime direct and indirect costs, but resulted in a lower increase in treatment cost at £3078 (US $3914) per patient. Compared with standard intervention, total costs were increased in this scenario by £70 (US $89) per patient.
There was an increase of 0.10 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in patients who received early treatment, from 5.4 QALYs for the standard intervention to 5.5 QALYs for early therapy.
Early intervention versus standard intervention was shown to be cost-effective at a threshold of £30,000 (US $38,147) per QALY, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of £17,335 (US $22,042) per QALY for reference anti-TNF agents and £713 (US $907) per QALY with biosimilars.
While additional research is warranted, say the authors, this analysis is an important first step in research on early biologic therapy for patients with RA, and suggest that early biologic or biosimilar intervention is cost-effective and carries very low ICERs.
Reference
Patel D, Shelbaya A, Cheung R, Aggarwal J, Park SH, Coindreau J. Cost-effectiveness of early treatment with originator biologics or their biosimilars after methotrexate failure in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis [published online May 30, 2019]. Adv Ther. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00986-7.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
EHA 2024: Rituximab Biosimilars Improve Quality of Life, Infusion-Related Reactions
June 27th 2024Two posters presented at the European Hematology Association’s annual meeting (EHA 2024) evaluated how rituximab biosimilars impact quality of life and infusion-related reactions in patients with lymphatic cancers.
Biosimilar Adoption in the UK: Patient and Consultant Views on Safety and Switching
June 26th 2024Lack of knowledge and confidence in biosimilars continues despite growing education efforts, impacting provider willingness to prescribe biosimilar medicines and patient perceptions about their treatment and switching to a biosimilar.