The European Federation of Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Associations (EFCCA), an umbrella organization that represents 34 patient associations around the world, recently released a report on healthcare inequities among nations and regions. In the report, the EFCCA identified disparities in access to biologics and biosimilars.
The European Federation of Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Associations (EFCCA), an umbrella organization that represents 34 patient associations around the world, recently released a report on healthcare inequities among nations and regions. In the report, the EFCCA identified disparities in access to biologics and biosimilars for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
To compile the report, EFCCA surveyed 32 national associations about the availability and coverage of biologics and biosimilars in their respective nations. Associations participating in the survey represented Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Responders reported that adalimumab (Humira) is approved to treat IBD diagnoses in all of the participating countries. In addition:
Reference infliximab (Remicade) is also approved to treat IBD in each of the participating countries.
Biosimilar infliximab, Inflectra, was reported as approved to treat IBD in 27 nations (84%).
Interestingly the same molecule, when marketed as Remsima, had differences in availability and coverage compared with the Inflectra-branded biosimilar. Respondents indicated that the Remsima-branded drug was approved for IBD in 25 nations (78%) and was fully covered in 12 nations (48%). However, only 11 nations (44%) reported preconditions for use.
“The outcomes of this survey also show clearly that access to new innovative therapies in different countries is far from equal,” write the report’s authors. “Apart from the differences between countries, there are also regional differences within the same country; these may be due to geographical or economic issues. Although it is understandable that access to health care services…can be very different, it puts patients in highly unequal positions.”
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Switching From Avastin to Bevacizumab-bvzr in CRC, NSCLC Can Reduce Medicare Costs
May 10th 2025Monthly savings from fully converting Medicare patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from reference bevacizumab to bevacizumab-bvzr could fund 13,887 and 8,959 additional patient-months of treatment, respectively, according to a cost-effectiveness study.