- Bone Health
- Immunology
- Hematology
- Respiratory
- Dermatology
- Diabetes
- Gastroenterology
- Neurology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Rare Disease
- Rheumatology
European Study: Patients Remain on Ineffective RA Treatment for Too Long
If European League Against Rheumatism guidelines are followed, when a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) does not reach remission or a state of low disease activity after 6 months of treatment, then the patient’s treatment should be modified regardless of the drug therapy being used (biologic or small molecule).
Approximately 1% of the global population has rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and treating RA is costly, especially when biologic drugs are necessary after the failure of small-molecule drugs. A recent study conducted in Poland sought to understand how patients diagnosed with RA progressed through treatments for their disease.
Using the Polish National Health Fund data, researchers identified 1167 patients with RA who began therapy in 2009. The patients, who were followed until 2014, initiated treatment with the following drugs financed under the government’s public payer program: the small-molecule leflunomide (53.6%) and the biologics adalimumab (5.8%), etanercept (14.4%), infliximab (23.1%), and rituximab (3%).
During the first year of treatment, 80.9% of patients continued to receive adalimumab, 85.4% continued to receive etanercept, 84.1% continued to receive infliximab, and 74.9% continued to receive leflunomide. In total, 186 patients (16%) stopped or paused therapy after the first year, and during the 2 following years, 754 patients (65%) did so.
The most therapy changes occurred for patients who had started treatment with infliximab; after year 6, 96% of patients had changed from infliximab to another option. Adalimumab had the second highest frequency of changes, with 85% of patients changing drugs by year 6.
The authors of the study say that, if European League Against Rheumatism guidelines are followed, when a patient with RA does not reach remission or a state of low disease activity after 6 months of treatment, then the patient’s treatment should be modified regardless of the drug therapy being used (biologic or small molecule). However, according to their findings, most therapies were continued for 1 year or more before discontinuation. In total, say the authors, between 50% and 70% of the patients followed in this study remained on an RA treatment for an inappropriate length of time.
Reference
Tłustochowicz M, Śliwczyński AM, Brzozowska M, Teter Z, Marczak M. Sequentiality of treatment in the rheumatoid arthritis drug programme in the years 2009-2014. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(3):569-571. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.58924.
Newsletter
Where clinical, regulatory, and economic perspectives converge—sign up for Center for Biosimilars® emails to get expert insights on emerging treatment paradigms, biosimilar policy, and real-world outcomes that shape patient care.
Adalimumab Biosimilar Maintains Effectiveness for Patients With Arthritis and Health Care Costs
August 2nd 2025Patients with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis maintained stable disease activity and functional capacity, with even some improvement in ultrasound findings, after switching from original adalimumab to its biosimilar, GP2017.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
August 2nd 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
August 2nd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
