As Regeneron gears up for a legal battle with biosimilar competitors for its reference aflibercept, CareFirst files a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson for restricting biosimilar ustekinumab competition; Celltrion and Accord BioPharma file with the FDA to approve their respective biosimilar candidates.
As Regeneron gears up for a legal battle with biosimilar competitors for its reference aflibercept, CareFirst files a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) for restricting biosimilar ustekinumab competition, and Celltrion and Accord BioPharma file with the FDA to approve their respective biosimilar candidates.
New Lawsuits Regarding Biosimilars
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals filed a lawsuit against Samsung Bioepis over the development of the latter’s aflibercept biosimilar candidate. The biosimilar references Regeneron’s Eylea, an anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agent used to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
The lawsuit claims that Samsung Bioepis infringed 51 of Regeneron’s patents related to Eylea, as described in the 83-page complaint. Regeneron chose to file the suit in a West Virginia federal court, the same court that presided over Regeneron’s previous legal battle with Viatris, also over the development of an aflibercept biosimilar. The Viatris suit resulted in the judge ruling in favor of Regeneron, saying that Viatris infringed 1 patent that isn’t set to expire until June 2027.
Reference biologic manufacturers have a long history of suing biosimilar manufacturers over patent disputes, presumably to delay biosimilar competitors from entering the market. This tactic has been seen in the adalimumab (Humira) space, delaying competition until 2023, and ustekinumab (Stelara) space, where 2 lawsuits have resulted in market delays until 2025.
However, in the instance of ustekinumab, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield filed a lawsuit against the reference manufacturer J&J, alleging that the company is “scheming” to delay competition, creating a monopoly in a profitable market “beyond the date of [Stelara’s] legitimate patent exclusivity.”
The law firm managing CareFirst’s case argued that without biosimilar competition, health care purchases for ustekinumab must pay pricing above what would be sustained in a competitive market.
If CareFirst comes out on top, the class action will break J&J’s ustekinumab monopoly and enable payers and consumers to obtain biosimilar versions of Stelara for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
FDA Accepts Applications for 2 Biosimilars
The FDA has accepted 2 biologics license applications (BLAs) for biosimilars, including 1 ustekinumab product and 1 denosumab candidate.
Celltrion announced that its application for CT-P41, a proposed biosimilar to Amgen’s Prolia/Xgeva (denosumab), was also accepted for review, as reported by MarketScreener. If approved, the product would be used to treat osteoporosis, as well as prevent bone fractures in patients with bone-related cancers at high risk of fracture. Another BLA for Sandoz’ denosumab biosimilar is also under review.
Accord Biopharma also submitted a BLA for an ustekinumab biosimilar (DMB-3115). If approved, DMB-3115 will be used to treat plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn disease, and ulcerative colitis.
In the US, reference ustekinumab (Stelara) accumulated $13.9 billion in sales in 2022 and is one of the top-selling biologics in the world.
"The ability of DMB-3115's reference product, Stelara, to treat autoimmune diseases is well established and we're excited to take this important step toward providing patients a more accessible avenue to treatment for conditions that present such a significant disease burden," said Chrys Kokino, US president of Accord. "Our mission to go beyond the biology of medicine includes seeking to ease the financial burden for patients and the US health care system by providing medicines that may be more affordable, such as biosimilars."
In 2013, the joint development for DMB-3115 was undertaken by Dong-A Socio Holdings and Meiji Seika Pharma, with exclusive commercialization rights granted to Intas Pharmaceuticals through a partnership announced in 2021. Accord Biopharma is a global subsidiary of Intas Pharmaceuticals and it will be responsible for commercialization of the biosimilar in the US.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Similar Persistence Rates Between Adalimumab New Starts, Switched Patients
December 7th 2024A French real-world study found that the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 was effective in treating rheumatic or gastrointestinal immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, showing no loss of disease control in switched patients and similar persistence rates between naive and switched groups.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Cost and Efficacy Insights on Infliximab Biosimilars in Pediatric Uveitis
December 3rd 2024The study highlights the safety, efficacy, and cost benefits of infliximab biosimilars in managing pediatric noninfectious uveitis, showing fewer disease flares and reduced costs compared with reference infliximab, as well as the influence of insurance mandates on treatment decisions.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.