In Pfenex’s fourth-quarter 2017 investor call, Evert Schimmelpennink, CEO, president, secretary, and director, hinted that Pfenex may be ready to resume work on 2 biosimilar candidates whose programs had been on hiatus.
In Pfenex’s fourth-quarter 2017 investor call this month, Evert Schimmelpennink, CEO, president, secretary, and director, hinted that Pfenex may be ready to resume work on 2 biosimilar candidates whose programs had been on hiatus.
Previously, in its 2017 third-quarter call held in November 2017, Pfenex announced the company’s “decision to pause development activities” for PF582, a ranibizumab biosimilar referencing Lucentis, and PF529, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar referencing Neulasta, after a strategic review of both costs and development timelines for the drugs.
In this month’s call, Schimmelpennink said, “We continue to believe that the most prudent path for the development is a collaboration with a strategic development partner. As that business development process continues, we continue to seek partners with whom we would advance those programs.” Halting development of the 2 programs lowered research and development costs to $7.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 compared with $10.7 million in the same period in 2016, said Schimmelpennink.
Pfenex previously partnered with Hospira on the ranibizumab biosimilar candidate, but after Pfizer acquired Hospira in 2016, Pfizer terminated the collaboration.
Pfenex did not address its progress on the third biosimilar its pipeline, a pegaspargase candidate referencing Oncaspar. The company’s lead products include PF708, a “therapeutic equivalent candidate” to teriparatide (Forteo) for the treatment of osteoporosis, and 2 novel anthrax vaccine candidates, Px563L and RPA563, which it is developing through a contract with the US government.
In addition, the company continues to develop hematology and oncology products in collaboration with Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Under Pfenex’s agreement with Jazz, Pfenex received upfront and option payment totaling $15 million, and may be eligible to receive payments of up to $166 million based on achievements of certain development, regulatory, and sales milestones.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Eye on Pharma: BI Cyltezo Partnership; Europe Ustekinumab Launch; Mexico Biosimilar Approval
July 24th 2024Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) partners with GoodRx to offer its unbranded adalimumab biosimilar to patients at an exclusive low price; a new ustekinumab biosimilar launches in Europe; and Mexican officials approve a bevacizumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Real-World Study: No Increase in Health Resource Costs After Infliximab Biosimilar Introduction
July 20th 2024Although biosimilars reduce drug purchasing costs for hospitals, it’s unclear whether those savings might be offset by increased health resource utilization following a non-medical switching initiative.