In the first week of October, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, announced 2 new initiatives intended to make drugs more widely available: the first is designed to help developers of complex generics better navigate the approvals process, and the second aims to streamline access to investigational treatments for compassionate use.
In the first week of October, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, announced 2 new initiatives intended to make drugs more widely available: the first is designed to help developers of complex generics better navigate the approvals process, and the second aims to streamline access to investigational treatments for compassionate use.
On Monday, Gottlieb announced that the FDA has adopted a new set of policies to speed the approval of complex generic drugs, including injectable drugs, that are harder to produce as generics. Because development of complex generics poses additional challenges, innovator drugs face little competition even after losing patent protection. According to Gottlieb, “because brand-name versions of complex drug products are often higher-priced than many other brand name drugs, any steps we can take to encourage the development of generic competitors to complex drugs will have an outsized impact on access, and prices.”
In order to help reduce the number of review cycles necessary to approve these complex generics, the FDA has released new draft guidance, “Formal Meetings Between FDA and ANDA [abbreviated new drug application] Applicants of Complex Products Under GDUFA [Generic Drug User Fee Amendments],” that seeks to improve development timelines through earlier, better meetings between developers and the agency. The document describes the pathway for communication between the FDA and an applicant submitting an ANDA for a complex product, which the FDA defines as one with complex:
The guidance also describes in detail the purpose, scope, and criteria for holding product development, presubmission, and mid-cycle reviews between the applicant and the agency.
The second initiative, announced on Tuesday, aims to expand patient access to investigational treatments for compassionate use. Gottlieb wrote in his blog that the “FDA recognizes that time is critical for these seriously ill patients who do not have alternative therapies, and who cannot take part in a clinical trial of an investigational therapy,” and announced that the agency is revising a policy that had the potential to slow patient access to investigational drugs. Previously, a physician seeking to prescribe such a treatment to a patient under expanded access would require approval from the full Institutional Review Board (IRB) at his or her facility, and infrequent convening of such boards could potentially cause delays. Moving forward, approval from just 1 IRB member, such as a chairperson, will be required.
Gottlieb pointed out, however, that drug makers cannot be compelled to provide investigational drugs, and that some companies are concerned about how adverse events (AEs) that occur in patients who receive investigational drugs could be viewed by the FDA. In attempting to address some of these concerns, the agency updated its guidance document “Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs for Treatment Use—Questions and Answers.” In the guidance, the agency states that it is “not aware of instances in which [AE] information from expanded access has prevented FDA from approving a drug,” and said that its reviewers were aware that expanded access occurs outside a controlled trial setting, and that patients receiving expanded access may be experiencing more advanced stages of disease, may have comorbidities, or may be receiving additional therapies. It also clarifies the fact that AEs must be reported only if there is evidence that they were caused by the drug therapy.
Gottlieb also noted that the agency would continue to make simplifications and clarifications to its processes for expanded access in the days ahead.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
BioRationality: Removing the Misconceptions Surrounding Interchangeability
April 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines the current state of interchangeable biosimilars in the US and policy changes needed to clear up misconceptions surrounding the meaning behind interchangeability designations.
Biosimilars Council: PBM Rebate Schemes Cost Americans, Payers $6 Billion
April 10th 2024A report from the Biosimilars Council evaluating IQVIA data found that rebate schemes orchestrated by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are costing US patients and payers billions of dollars by suppressing biosimilar adoption.