In light of the publication of HHS' blueprint to reduce drug prices, the FDA has announced the issuance of 2 final guidance documents to provide greater clarity on medical product communications.
In light of the publication of HHS's blueprint to reduce drug prices, the FDA has announced the issuance of 2 final guidance documents to provide greater clarity on medical product communications.
The first document, entitled “Drug and Device Manufacturer Communications with Payors, Formulary Committees, and Similar Entities—Questions and Answers” seeks to answer common inquiries the FDA receives from insurers and other industry stakeholders regarding a pharmaceutical company’s drug or medical device. In addition, the guidance also provides answers to questions from industry stakeholders related to a medical product that has not been approved yet.
“We have heard from some manufacturers that in the absence of clear guidance from the agency, they were inhibited from sharing certain economic and other information and, potentially, even from generating additional rigorous data for payers to evaluate in determining the value of a product to their health plans and their beneficiaries, and then to tie value-based contracts to these measures,” according to a statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD.
In addition, Gottlieb said, the FDA believes the information provided by manufacturers to payers about their medical products is critical, and therefore must be both truthful and accurate while also including enough background information to allow payers to make informed decisions.
The second guidance document, “Medical Product Communications That Are Consistent With the FDA-Required Labeling,” provides an overview of the FDA’s viewpoint on how manufacturers should share information about a medical product that isn’t included in the product’s label (but is consistent with that labeling).
According to the guidance, while the labeling of a medical product includes essential information about the product to ensure safe and effective use, it is not required that the label includes all information known about the product.
Some information not included in a product's label may still be beneficial to payers to help inform purchase decisions or serve as a basis for value-based contracts; this information can include data from post-market studies and surveillance of a product’s approved uses, or additional information from premarket studies.
“The ultimate goal is to help facilitate a market that is more competitive, based on the outcomes that matter most—the benefit to patients. Helping facilitate appropriate company communications with these audiences may help foster these outcomes and enable better access to medical products and possibly more affordable options for Americans,” stated Gottlieb.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Eye on Pharma: Interchangeability Labels and Expanded Biosimilar Partnerships
May 29th 2025The FDA designates 2 biosimilars as interchangeable, enhancing access to treatments for inflammatory diseases and multiple sclerosis, while 2 other companies expand their biosimilar partnership to include more products.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.