In light of the publication of HHS' blueprint to reduce drug prices, the FDA has announced the issuance of 2 final guidance documents to provide greater clarity on medical product communications.
In light of the publication of HHS's blueprint to reduce drug prices, the FDA has announced the issuance of 2 final guidance documents to provide greater clarity on medical product communications.
The first document, entitled “Drug and Device Manufacturer Communications with Payors, Formulary Committees, and Similar Entities—Questions and Answers” seeks to answer common inquiries the FDA receives from insurers and other industry stakeholders regarding a pharmaceutical company’s drug or medical device. In addition, the guidance also provides answers to questions from industry stakeholders related to a medical product that has not been approved yet.
“We have heard from some manufacturers that in the absence of clear guidance from the agency, they were inhibited from sharing certain economic and other information and, potentially, even from generating additional rigorous data for payers to evaluate in determining the value of a product to their health plans and their beneficiaries, and then to tie value-based contracts to these measures,” according to a statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD.
In addition, Gottlieb said, the FDA believes the information provided by manufacturers to payers about their medical products is critical, and therefore must be both truthful and accurate while also including enough background information to allow payers to make informed decisions.
The second guidance document, “Medical Product Communications That Are Consistent With the FDA-Required Labeling,” provides an overview of the FDA’s viewpoint on how manufacturers should share information about a medical product that isn’t included in the product’s label (but is consistent with that labeling).
According to the guidance, while the labeling of a medical product includes essential information about the product to ensure safe and effective use, it is not required that the label includes all information known about the product.
Some information not included in a product's label may still be beneficial to payers to help inform purchase decisions or serve as a basis for value-based contracts; this information can include data from post-market studies and surveillance of a product’s approved uses, or additional information from premarket studies.
“The ultimate goal is to help facilitate a market that is more competitive, based on the outcomes that matter most—the benefit to patients. Helping facilitate appropriate company communications with these audiences may help foster these outcomes and enable better access to medical products and possibly more affordable options for Americans,” stated Gottlieb.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.