The agency will now review and act on original 351(k) biologics license application (BLA) supplements with clinical data within a 6-month time frame. Originally, such supplements had a 10-month goal date for review. In addition, applicants can now request the FDA refrain from taking action on supplements of 351(k) BLAs before a certain date.
On February 6, the US FDA published a new draft guidance entitled “Biosimilars and Interchangeable Biosimilars: Licensure for Fewer Than All Conditions of Use for Which the Reference Product Has Been Licensed.”
The agency will now review and act on original 351(k) biologics license application (BLA) supplements with clinical data within a 6-month time frame. Originally, such supplements had a 10-month goal date for review. In addition, applicants can now request the FDA refrain from taking action on supplements of 351(k) BLA before a certain date.
“As part of its review, FDA assesses the manufacturing process and the manufacturer’s strategy to control within-product variations. These control strategies are put in place to help ensure that manufacturers produce biological products with consistent clinical performance,” the FDA states.
The draft provides recommendations to applicants who are seeking licenses for a proposed biosimilar or interchangeable application supplements, with the aim of expediting reviews for biosimilars supplements. It can also be used to update initial biosimilar approvals when it is for fewer than all the reference product’s approved conditions.
According to the guidance, biosimilars or interchangeable products cannot be licensed for an indication by the FDA if they are protected by orphan drug exclusivity or pediatric exclusivity, until that exclusivity expires. Applicants can submit a supplement to the licensed 351(k) BLA for the previously protected indication once any exclusivity or patent expires.
The FDA recommends that when possible, an applicant who is seeking licensure for a proposed interchangeable product also seek licensure for all of the reference product’s licensed conditions of use.
Proposed biosimilar labeling will be dependent on whether the applicant seeks licensure for all or fewer of the conditions of use licensed for the reference product, according to RAPS.
Electronic or written comments on the draft can be submitted until April 7, 2020, before the final version of the guidance is released.
BioRationality: FDA Clarification Provides New Indications and Process Change for Biosimilars
September 9th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains the FDA's new guidelines on post-approval changes for biosimilars, emphasizing the processes for reporting modifications, comparability assessments, and the potential for biosimilars to introduce new indications or formulation changes, which could significantly impact their market competitiveness and accessibility.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
BioRationality: FDA Opens Up Biosimilar Inquiries on Reddit
August 26th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, urges stakeholders to engage with the FDA on its Reddit forum—where a representative will answer complex biosimilar questions—encourages clearing misconceptions, and advocates for updates to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act guidelines.
Eye on Pharma: Celltrion, Costco Partnership; Amgen Sues Samsung Bioepis; Denosumab Results
August 21st 2024Celltrion's adalimumab-aaty biosimilar is now accessible for all Costco members, while Amgen sues Samsung Bioepis over the latter’s denosumab biosimilar candidate, and GlycoNex progresses its denosumab biosimilar SPD8 to phase 3 trials.