This week, the FDA announced that it has issued a direct final rule that amends the biologics regulations to remove what it calls “outdated requirements” and help to eliminate inconsistencies and duplicative processes.
This week, the FDA announced that it has issued a direct final rule that amends the biologics regulations to remove what it calls “outdated requirements” and help to eliminate inconsistencies and duplicative processes. Specifically, the rule addresses how frequently the FDA inspects some facilities, and the listed duties of the inspector.
In the past, the FDA required biennial inspections of drug and biological manufacturing facilities. However, with the introduction of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) on July 9, 2012, the biennial inspection requirement was replaced with a requirement for the FDA to inspect manufacturing plants on a risk-based schedule.
The direct final rule aligns with the FDASIA framework, accommodates the risk-based framework, and clarifies the FDA’s flexibility under FDASIA to inspect facilities either more or less frequently as appropriate.
“Biologics are at the forefront of some of the most significant medical advances of the 21 century, but many are also complicated to manufacture. The new regulations reflect the FDA's flexibility to prioritize its inspectional resources to higher-risk facilities, such as those that produce vaccines or gene therapies, and those that have complex manufacturing steps and must be more closely monitored due to the potential for more risk,” said said FDA Commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, MD, in a statement.
“While this means the inspection frequency for some establishments will be reduced, for some facilities it may increase. We’ll continue to inspect facilities at the same standards and enforce the laws and regulations on manufacturing that help protect patients,” Gottlieb added.
In addition to clarifying the frequency of inspection of manufacturing plants, the rule also removes outdated “duties of inspector” requirements. The FDA has deemed that it was unnecessary to list these obligations in the document because those duties are duplicated in the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). The removal of these regulations, however, does not change the inspection requirements, nor does it amend the actual duties of an investigator.
The final rule applies to all licensed biological products. The FDA hopes that this change will clarify its flexibility to prioritize its inspection resources to higher-risk facilities, such as those involved in the manufacturing of products that raise potentially significant safety concerns.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.