The FDA this week announced draft guidance that would allow stakeholders to propose pharmaceutical quality standards for potential informal recognition to increase efficiency in drug development by achieving “voluntary consensus standards.”
The FDA this week announced draft guidance that would allow stakeholders to propose pharmaceutical quality standards for potential informal recognition to increase efficiency in drug development by achieving “voluntary consensus standards.”
In a statement, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said the changes are aimed at improving quality, lowering drug costs, and reducing regulatory uncertainty. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) unveiled a 7-page document called the Program for the Recognition of Voluntary Consensus Standards Related to Pharmaceutical Quality. The program would be different from formal recognition of quality as established by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
Instead, it would facilitate submissions by external stakeholders and CDER staff with the aim of fostering innovation and streamlining the compilation and assessment of marketing applications for products regulated by CDER. Use of an informally recognized consensus standard will be strictly voluntary, and even if a developer uses one of the voluntary standards, CDER may still request that the applicant provide additional information to support an investigational new drug (IND) application or a marketing application.
“While this program is intended for all drugs, brand and generics, we know that it will have a positive effect in supporting more efficient development and production of generic drugs, which often operate under small margins compared to brand drugs,” said Gottlieb. “Creating efficiencies in generic and biosimilar manufacturing is an important part of our work to streamline generic and biosimilar development overall, to help spur competition in the prescription drug market as part of our Drug Competition Action Plan (DCAP) and Biosimilar Action Plan.”
Voluntary recognition of a standard may also reduce regulatory uncertainty, he said. If a standard has been recognized, applicants can focus on appropriate use of the method and the acceptance criteria instead of validating the approach outlined in the standard.
The informally recognized standards related to pharmaceutical quality will be publicly available. Gottlieb said the program does not apply to standards that are already legally binding.
In another move, the FDA will also announce a pilot program aimed at increasing the efficiency of “established conditions” used in the product's lifecycle post-approval.
The pilot will build on draft guidance released last year called “Q12 Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management.” The guidance is a risk-based approach to regulatory oversight of post-approval manufacturing changes. It gives a mechanism for applicants to gain FDA agreement on the established conditions (ECs) necessary to ensure product quality, and to facilitate postapproval changes to those established conditions.
The pilot will assist with receiving, assessing, and engaging with applicants regarding proposed ECs, which are intended to help reduce submissions of unnecessary postapproval supplement applications. Manufacturers will be encouraged “to continually improve their processes using the agreed-upon ECs as their guardrails,” Gottlieb said. “This can help promote manufacturing innovations that can improve the quality and safety of drug manufacturing, and potentially lower the cost of finished drug products.”
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.