The FDA has released updated draft guidance on population pharmacokinetics (PK). The update follows draft guidance originally put forth by the agency in 1999.
The FDA has released updated draft guidance on population pharmacokinetics (PK). The update follows draft guidance originally put forth by the agency in 1999.
The guidance aims to assist developers submitting New Drug Applications and Biologics License Applications (BLAs) with applying population PK analysis, which quantifies and explains the variability in drug concentrations among individuals and can sometimes reduce the need for postmarketing requirements or commitments.
Because stand-alone studies are usually designed to focus on intrinsic and extrinsic factors that have a high potential to affect drug exposure, they leave other possible interactions unstudied; population PK analysis allows for an assessment of multiple factors that are not otherwise evaluated in healthy volunteers and allows for a large number of patients to be included.
According the updated draft guidance, sponsors are encouraged to use all available data to support their population PK models; data sets should include a sufficient number of subjects with adequate PK samples at informative timepoints, and sponsors should be aware that, as the number of samples per subject decreases, the importance of the timing of PK sampling increases. Sponsors are encouraged to collect PK data from all included patients.
The guidance also provides a description of methodological aspects of population PK analysis, including examination of the observed data, model development, model validation, and simulations based on population PK models. It also outlines the recommended content and format for a drug sponsor to submit its population PK analysis in support of its clinical pharmacology program.
Population PK is becoming an increasingly important way for drug sponsors to provide information about the impact of multiple factors on the PK of their products; one recent study reported that biologics whose data included population PK models most frequently included body size as a covariate in final models, although age, sex, race, and renal function are also included in some models. In 70% to 90% of cases in which these covariates are examined, information from the population PK studies is eventually included in product labels.1
According to another recent paper, population PK modeling and simulation analysis is almost always a component of BLAs for novel drugs, and these analyses can provide a robust knowledge base to support biosimilar development, as they can help with optimizing study design.2
Reference
1. Ogasawara K, Alexander GC. Use of population pharmacokinetic analyses among FDA-approved biologics [published online February 1, 2019]. Clin Pharamcol Drug Dev. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.658.
2. Wang YC, Wang Y, Schrieber SJ, et al. Role of modeling and simulation in the development of novel and biosimilar therapeutic proteins. J Pharm Sci. 2019;108(1):73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.053.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.