In an effort to speed more generic drug approvals, the FDA said it is changing how it assigns priority review status to abbreviated new drug applications.
The FDA released another set of changes this week, this time changing how abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) are prioritized for review so that the agency’s resources are allocated to generic drugs that would have the biggest impact on public health.
Before, “roughly half of all ANDA submissions were designated as priority submissions, including many products that could not be marketed for several years as a result of blocking patents or exclusivities,” according to Sally Choe, PhD, director of the Office of Generic Drugs in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Under the previous version of the Manual of Policies and Procedures (MAPP) 5240.3, Prioritization of the Review of Original ANDAs, Amendments, and Supplements, the FDA prioritized submissions from first filers and from applicants with paragraph IV certifications, even though the drugs would not be able to come to market for years due to a patent, 30-month stay, or exclusivity blocking final approval. A paragraph IV certification is a generic applicant’s assertion that the brand-name product’s patents listed in the Orange Book are invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed by the proposed generic product.
This did not improve generic drug access, the FDA said; wider access could have the effect of “potentially lowering costs by expediting the availability of safe, high-quality, effective generic medicines in areas of the market with limited competition,” said Choe.
Under the change, an original ANDA must meet certain criteria in order to have a priority review. Those include:
Among other things, prioritization factors include:
The change applies to both regular generic drugs as well as complex generics, which generally mean drugs with complex active ingredients, complex formulations, complex routes of delivery, or complex dosage forms.
Separately, the House Energy and Commerce Committee made a bipartisan request earlier this month to FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD, asking for additional information about the approval process for complex generic drugs. According to the letter, the representatives want information about whether the agency’s “initiatives and commitments are sufficient to address the particular challenge of approving complex generic drugs” and to find out if “additional authority is needed to improve the approval process for complex generic drugs to increase access and reduce costs.”
Among other things, the committee asked for a list of list of all complex generic drugs approved by FDA since October 1, 2016, including the date of the first submission, the dates of other milestones and the date of approval, and the number of pre-ANDA meeting requests that FDA has received each year since the program was launched, the number of pre-ANDA meetings that FDA has held each year, and. the number of ANDAs that have been submitted for products discussed during these meetings.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.