In an effort to speed more generic drug approvals, the FDA said it is changing how it assigns priority review status to abbreviated new drug applications.
The FDA released another set of changes this week, this time changing how abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) are prioritized for review so that the agency’s resources are allocated to generic drugs that would have the biggest impact on public health.
Before, “roughly half of all ANDA submissions were designated as priority submissions, including many products that could not be marketed for several years as a result of blocking patents or exclusivities,” according to Sally Choe, PhD, director of the Office of Generic Drugs in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Under the previous version of the Manual of Policies and Procedures (MAPP) 5240.3, Prioritization of the Review of Original ANDAs, Amendments, and Supplements, the FDA prioritized submissions from first filers and from applicants with paragraph IV certifications, even though the drugs would not be able to come to market for years due to a patent, 30-month stay, or exclusivity blocking final approval. A paragraph IV certification is a generic applicant’s assertion that the brand-name product’s patents listed in the Orange Book are invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed by the proposed generic product.
This did not improve generic drug access, the FDA said; wider access could have the effect of “potentially lowering costs by expediting the availability of safe, high-quality, effective generic medicines in areas of the market with limited competition,” said Choe.
Under the change, an original ANDA must meet certain criteria in order to have a priority review. Those include:
Among other things, prioritization factors include:
The change applies to both regular generic drugs as well as complex generics, which generally mean drugs with complex active ingredients, complex formulations, complex routes of delivery, or complex dosage forms.
Separately, the House Energy and Commerce Committee made a bipartisan request earlier this month to FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD, asking for additional information about the approval process for complex generic drugs. According to the letter, the representatives want information about whether the agency’s “initiatives and commitments are sufficient to address the particular challenge of approving complex generic drugs” and to find out if “additional authority is needed to improve the approval process for complex generic drugs to increase access and reduce costs.”
Among other things, the committee asked for a list of list of all complex generic drugs approved by FDA since October 1, 2016, including the date of the first submission, the dates of other milestones and the date of approval, and the number of pre-ANDA meeting requests that FDA has received each year since the program was launched, the number of pre-ANDA meetings that FDA has held each year, and. the number of ANDAs that have been submitted for products discussed during these meetings.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Market Development Requires Strategic Flexibility and Global Partnerships
April 29th 2025Thriving in the evolving biosimilar market demands bold collaboration, early global partnerships, and a fresh approach to development strategies to overcome uncertainty and drive future success.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.