On June 29, the Federal Register published the FDA’s request for comments concerning its statement of work for an assessment of the Program for Enhanced Review Transparency and Communication for original 351(k) Biologics License Applications.
On June 29, the Federal Register published the FDA’s request for comments concerning its statement of work for an assessment of the Program for Enhanced Review Transparency and Communication for original 351(k) Biologics License Applications (BLAs) submitted under the Public Health Service Act.
The newly proposed program is part of the FDA’s performance commitments made under the proposed reauthorization of the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA). The BsUFA, first passed into law in 2012, allows the FDA to collect user fees for the review of BLAs. If reauthorized, the act in its new form, BsUFA II, will allow the FDA to continue to collect such fees until 2022.
The FDA applies user fees to the review of applications through a variety of means, including the hiring of reviewers and support staff and the upgrade of its information technology resources. In its commitment letter, the FDA agrees to review performance goals associated with user fees, including the completion of applications and the taking of regulatory action within predictable timeframes. As part of its recommendations for BsUFA II, the FDA proposed a commitment to implement a review program for BLAs in order to minimize the number of review cycles needed for approval.
The new review program will facilitate additional communication between the agency and the applicant, and will further allow both parties to agree on a formal communication plan. The FDA says that an optimal review will allow for resolution of issues including labeling negotiation, risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, and post-marketing requirements and commitments that must be addressed before the agency can issue an approval.
The FDA seeks to evaluate the impact of the new program on the overall efficiency of application review; key objectives of the program’s assessment as described in the FDA’s statement of work include the following:
Comments on the Program for Enhanced Review Transparency and Communication for biosimilar products in BsUFA II will be accepted on Docket Number FDA-2017-N-3199 until July 31.
Meanwhile, the industry awaits congressional reauthorization of the BsUFA. Congress must reauthorize the BsUFA II prior to its summer recess if the act is to take effect in October as anticipated. A vote on reauthorization, which has bipartisan support, is expected in July.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.