Last week, Amgen and Allergan announced that the FDA will review data supporting the firms' Biologics License Application for ABP 215, a bevacizumab (Avastin) biosimilar candidate.
Last week, Amgen and Allergan announced that the FDA will review data supporting the firms’ Biologics License Application for ABP 215, a bevacizumab (Avastin) biosimilar candidate.
The FDA Advisory Committee will review the analytical, pharmacokinetic, and clinical data from studies on ABP 215, including the results of a phase 3 study that met its primary endpoint of demonstrating clinical equivalence to the reference product in patients undergoing treatment for non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer. The study also demonstrated comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles for ABP 215 and the reference bevacizumab.
While Amgen and Allergan have said that they believe their product to be the first bevacizumab biosimilar submitted for consideration in the United States, the reference product’s manufacturer, Roche, sees competition brewing in Europe—the European Medicines Agency has confirmed that it is currently considering 2 applications for bevacizumab biosimilars.
Roche, in attempting to retain its hold on the $6.8 billion bevacizumab market, has asserted that its patent protection for bevacizumab extends until 2019. The firm filed a complaint in the US courts in response to Amgen and Allergan’s application, and seeks to bar the biosimilar product from the US market until the patent dispute has been resolved.
Roche’s argument hinges upon the so-called “patent dance” requirements as laid out in the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act. However, after this week’s Supreme Court ruling in Sandoz v Amgen, which held that the “patent dance” is optional, Roche may be forced to change its litigation approach.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.