Last week, the FDA announced that it will withdraw a direct final rule that proposed to amend general biologics regulations related to time of inspection requirements and to remove some duties of inspector requirements. In its statement withdrawing the rule, the FDA indicated that it had received significant adverse comments related to its proposal.
Last week, the FDA announced that it will withdraw a direct final rule that proposed to amend general biologics regulations related to time of inspection requirements and to remove some duties of inspector requirements. In its statement withdrawing the rule, the FDA indicated that it had received significant adverse comments related to its proposal. The agency did not respond to questions from The Center for Biosimilars® about the nature of the adverse comment or comments that led to withdrawal of the rule.
The FDA had made the decision to issue the rule directly because the agency had believed it included “only noncontroversial amendments,” and the FDA anticipated no significant adverse comments that would affect its plan. The rule was intended to remove what it referred to as “outdated requirements” and to help eliminate inconsistencies and duplicative processes.
“These existing codified requirements are unnecessary because they are duplicative of statutory requirements that apply to biological product inspections under section 704 of the [Food, Drugs, & Cosmetics Act] FD&C Act. Specifically, the inspection requirements in section 704 of the FD&C Act encompass all requirements outlined in §600.22. Thus, we are removing §600.22(a) through (h),” said the agency of its rule.
In the past, the FDA required biennial inspections of drug and biological manufacturing facilities. However, when the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) was introduced in 2012, the biennial inspection requirement was replaced with a risk-based schedule requirement for inspecting manufacturing plants.
“While this means the inspection frequency for some establishments will be reduced, for some facilities it may increase. We’ll continue to inspect facilities at the same standards and enforce the laws and regulations on manufacturing that help protect patients,” stated FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb of the rule.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
FDA Draft Guidance Removes Switching Study Requirements for Biosimilar Interchangeability
June 20th 2024The FDA has issued an update to its guidance on requiring switching study data for biosimilars to be granted interchangeability, citing new science that shows these studies aren’t needed to establish biosimilar safety.
British Columbia’s Biosimilar Switching Program Saves $732 Million in 5 Years
June 18th 2024British Columbia's 2019 Biosimilars Initiative, which transitioned over 40,000 patients from costly reference biologics to biosimilars, saved around $732 million in 5 years, maintained comparable health outcomes, and reinvested the savings to improve the province's public payer program.