Gillian Woollett, MA, DPhil, senior vice president, Avalere Health, discusses how “confirmation of sufficient likeness" should replace “totality of evidence” in biosimilar development.
Transcript
In biologics the whole question, [as] for biosimilars, has been whether they can be defined analytically. We now have the methods to define them sufficiently well that the question becomes, what else do you need? So our confirmation of sufficient lightness is based on the analytics, establishing that indeed, the two products you're comparing—the reference and the biosimilar candidate—are sufficiently alike, and we chose the new terminology so as not to imply a difference. And once you've got the confirmation, sufficient lightness analytically, then what our paper shows—and that'll be referenced—what our paper shows is that the biosimilars worldwide in US, Europe, Australia and Canada, if the PK [pharmacokinetic] matches, that product was going to be approved as biosimilar. So that then becomes the confirmation of sufficient likeness. And what we're asserting in the paper is there's no need for additional clinical studies, because they won't tell you anything. And if a clinical study won't tell you anything, it lacks scientific validity. Therefore, it lacks ethical validity. And it shouldn't be being done, and certainly not routinely.
We also would like to note that our paper, which was published in August [2019] in BioDrugs1, subsequently, the European regulators have published a paper, also in BioDrugs in September2, and they're coming to the same conclusions just based on European data. So we think there's definitely a case to be made here to revisit what you're doing, and therefore a new paradigm is entirely appropriate3 and we just like confirmation of sufficient lightness.
References
1. Webster CJ, Wong AC, Woollett GR. An efficient development paradigm for biosimilar BioDrugs. 2019;(33)603. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00371-4.
2. Wolff-Holz E, Tiitso K, Vleminckx C, Weise M. Evolution of the EU biosimilar framework: Past and future. BioDrugs. 2019;(33)621. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00377-y.
3. Vulto A. Delivering on the promise of biosimilars. BioDrugs. 2019;(33)599. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00388-9.
Q&A With Dr Chelsee Jensen: Navigating FDA Approvals, Challenges in the Biosimilar Landscape
January 14th 2024Chelsee Jensen, PharmD, BCPS, senior pharmacy specialist and pharmaceutical formulary manager at Mayo Clinic, reacts to the biggest FDA approvals of 2023 and how she sees the adalimumab, natalizumab, and tocilizumab spaces playing out.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
IGBA 2023: Dr Monique Mansoura Highlights the Intersection of Geopolitical Issues, Biopharma
February 19th 2023COVID-19 allowed governments to critically examine the biopharma space to increase access to vaccines, but there's still a way to go, according to Monique Mansoura, PhD, MBA, executive director of global health security and biotechnology at the MITRE Corporation, at the International Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association’s annual meeting.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.