The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, an executive-level coalition of regulators from 29 medicines regulatory authorities from territories including Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, and the United States, among others, recently released a statement of confidence in biosimilars.
The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA), an executive-level coalition of regulators from 29 medicines regulatory authorities from territories including Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, and the United States, among others, recently released a statement of confidence in biosimilars.
In the statement aimed at educating healthcare professionals, ICMRA said that it aims to provide assurance for stakeholders on the robust regulatory process for approval and monitoring of biosimilars and to highlight the benefits that biosimilars can provide for both patients and healthcare systems at large.
Biosimilars are medicines with proven quality, manufactured to the same quality standards as other biologics, and are only approved after rigorous scientific evaluation.
They explain that biosimilars must demonstrate high similarity to their reference products and that the foundation for providing this evidence of similarity comprises the extensive comparability studies that are undertaken using state-of-the-art analytical techniques that allow for robust comparison of the products’ molecules. Full clinical programs are not necessary except to help address remaining questions that may require human data (such as pharmacokinetics) to evaluate.
ICMRA highlights the fact that biosimilars have been used safely for many years, and no relevant differences in adverse effects have been observed between biosimilars and their references.
While regulatory pathways differ across countries, and while substitution at the pharmacy level is an issue regulated by nations individually, global regulators have confidence in the rigor of the approval process for biosimilars, and many regulators—and providers—accept switching to biosimilars as part of clinical practice.
However, ICMRA notes, copy biologics—sometimes called biomimics or biocopies—that are not approved on the basis of a robust biosimilar regulatory pathway must not be considered biosimilars; these noncomparable products have not been assessed in extensive comparability studies, so their quality is not assured.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
Eye on Pharma: Interchangeability Labels and Expanded Biosimilar Partnerships
May 29th 2025The FDA designates 2 biosimilars as interchangeable, enhancing access to treatments for inflammatory diseases and multiple sclerosis, while 2 other companies expand their biosimilar partnership to include more products.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.