During yesterday’s Federal Trade Commission public workshop on drug pricing competition, Scott Gottlieb, MD, Commissioner of the FDA, called on drug makers to “end the shenanigans” that delay drug competition in the US marketplace.
During yesterday’s Federal Trade Commission public workshop on drug pricing competition, Scott Gottlieb, MD, Commissioner of the FDA, called on drug makers to “end the shenanigans” that delay drug competition in the US marketplace.
Gottlieb’s comment came at the same time as a statement announcing new FDA draft guidance on streamlining the submission and review process for shared-system risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) programs. While REMS are designed to protect patient safety by providing such materials as medication guides or package inserts (and requiring activities like provider training and patient counseling in some cases), REMS have come under fire as a way that makers of innovator drugs can stave off competition from generics and biosimilars. Because originator product manufacturers and biosimilar or generic drug developers must agree on a single, shared REMS system, REMS programs can potentially be abused to delay the market entry of cheaper drugs.
“Negotiations to reach agreement on shared system REMS can take extended periods of time. This can block the timely entry of a generic competitor,” said Gottlieb. “I believe branded firms sometimes use these negotiations strategically, as a way to slow generic competitors.”
“[We] need to make sure that REMS programs maintain their role in serving public health and don’t become a tool companies can use to delay or block competition from generic products entering the market,” Gottlieb continued, announcing new FDA draft guidance for industry that describes how applicants can submit drug master files, representing all participating firms, to the agency.
The draft guidance, titled “Use of a Drug Master File for Shared System REMS Submissions,” eliminates the need for each manufacturer involved in a REMS process to submit files individually, eliminates duplicative paperwork for drug makers, and streamlines the forms that the FDA’s reviewers must assess. While the new drug master file system is not mandatory, Gottlieb said that “we strongly encourage” its use.
Under the system, only 1 company will be listed as the holder of the master file, and any submission to the file will be assumed to represent the views of all participating REMS applicants. The master file holder must submit a letter of authorization that allows the FDA to review the information in the file in support of REMS applicants.
Among the materials that should be included in the file are the REMS document and materials, the REMS supporting document, REMS assessments and assessment methodologies, REMS correspondence and history, interim versions of documents, responses to the FDA’s requests for information, and file amendments.
Gottlieb also indicated that the FDA will release more information about the circumstances under which it intends to waive the requirement of a single, shared REMS system, including information about how generic drug developers can request waivers.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.