FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, indicated that the agency would be putting forward policies that would compel branded drug makers to “tighten up their manufacturing, to have less variance of their biologics that are currently on the market.” In theory, this change could make it easier to develop a biosimilar using smaller studies.
In an interview today with CNBC’s Meg Tirrell at the Healthy Returns conference, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD said that early estimates of savings that could be garnered through biosimilars in the United States “probably weren’t realistic.” That said, “I think we will see a lot of biosimilar competition come on to the market. And I also think we're going to see more consumer and provider acceptance of using biosimilars.”
Gottlieb explained that the FDA is working on “advancing new policies to try to stimulate more biosimilar development. We're taking a hard look at how we determine interchangeability so that we can make determinations that biosimilars can be used interchangeably with the brand of drugs.”
Notably, Gottlieb said that, in looking at currently marketed biologics, “We see a lot of variants in lot-to-lot manufacturing of existing biologics and also a lot of variance in the products over time where there's drift in the sort of formulation of the biologics that are currently on the market. And those don't seem to have clinical consequence. But they could have clinical consequence.”
Product drift also makes biosimilar development more challenging, because “you have sort of a moving target on the market and you want to come in and create a biosimilar to copy it, you have to study your biosimilar against more drugs, more patients, because there's more variability in the currently marketed brand of drugs.”
Gottlieb indicated that the agency would be putting forward policies that would compel branded drug makers to “tighten up their manufacturing, to have less variance of their biologics that are currently on the market.” In theory, this change could make it easier to develop a biosimilar using smaller studies, he said.
When asked whether these policies will stimulate greater development of biosimilars, Gottlieb said that biosimilars would be “slow build,” but that the FDA is working on about “a dozen policies” concerning biosimilars. Yet there remain impediments to biosimilars, “whether it's distributive PBM or the health plan with these kickbacks, these rebates.” Providers, he said, will have to decide whether they will help to create a robust market, “Because if we don't see soon the ability of the biosimilars when they come to market to actually build market share, I'm worried that when manufacturers look at this market, they're going to say: ‘Look, this is too hard.’ We can't get more than 10 percent market share, so we're not going to make the investment.”
These comments come just weeks after Gottlieb addressed America’s Health Insurance Plans at its National Health Policy Conference, saying that “The economics of development are currently unstable; and the pipeline of biosimilar products that we hope for could be dramatically affected by the weakening of market incentives to bring these products to patients.”
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
FDA, EMA Approve Second Pair of Denosumab Biosimilars
February 17th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted approval, with interchangeability in the US, to Samsung Bioepis' denosumab biosimilars, which will be marketed under different names depending on whether they will be used to treat osteoporosis or bone metastases.