Despite their benefits to patients, innovative treatments, including biologics, come at a high cost to the healthcare system, and those in a position to make coverage decisions for these products must grapple with these therapies’ affordability. During the ISPOR 2019 meeting, researchers presented findings on how health plan restrictions could limit orphan drug coverage—and encourage biosimilar use—as a means to manage their budgets.
Despite their benefits to patients, innovative treatments, including biologics, come at a high cost to the healthcare system, and those in a position to make coverage decisions for these products must grapple with these therapies’ affordability. During the ISPOR 2019 meeting, researchers presented findings on how health plan restrictions could limit orphan drug coverage—and encourage biosimilar use—as a means to manage their budgets.
First, a research group presented findings from their investigation of whether US commercial health plan restrictions are likely to be implemented as a means to control spending on orphan drugs.1
Using the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug and Evidence Coverage database, which includes information on coverage decisions among 17 of the 20 largest US commercial plans, the team estimated a drug’s budget impact by considering its annual cost and the US prevalence of the disease for which it is indicated.
They considered patient subgroup restrictions, step therapy, limitations on which specialists can prescribe a drug, or any other restriction type, and included 2168 coverage decisions in their analysis.
They found that the odds of restricted coverage were 1.5 greater for orphan drugs with the largest budget impacts versus those with the smallest budget impacts, and that noncancer treatment, availability of alternative therapies, number of years since FDA approval, and self-administration of a drug were all associated with increased likelihood of restriction.
Another research team presented results of a survey of health plan executives that sought to investigate how health plans will address biosimilars as an alternative to higher-cost innovator drugs.2
The investigators conducted an online survey of 85 health plan executives on their plan information, including expected biosimilar coverage, restrictions, and copays. Plans represented by the respondents were national, regional, and local, and covered commercial, Medicaid, Medicare, employer- or self-funded, and integrated delivery network members.
In total, 46% of respondents reported their plan’s pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) as their specialty pharmacy provider, and 58% reported that providers were restricted with respect to products. Biosimilar use was expected to be allowed for all reference product indications by 58.8% of respondents, and 31.5% reported that their plans will restrict biosimilar use to approved indications. Another 9.8% said that indications will be used as the basis for copays for biosimilars, and 10% said that biosimilars are expected to be the only product made available.
Fifty-eight percent expected copays to be discounted off the innovator product’s copay, and 32% expected copays to vary based on the timing of a given biosimilar’s approval.
Respondents said they would provide education about biosimilars through different copays for biosimilars versus reference products (64.7%), prescriber and patient mailings (76.5%), prescriber and patient phone calls (51%).
In total, 66% of respondents said that they expect 20% savings from biosimilars within 5 years, the researchers found.
References
1. Margaretos N, Neumann PJ, Kim DD, Chambers J. Are health plans more likely to restrict coverage of orphan drugs with larget budget impacts? Presented at: International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 24th Annual International Meeting; May 18-22, 2019; New Orleans, Louisiana. Abstract PRO42.
2. Brook R, Smeeding JE, Carlise JA, Sax MJ. Management of specialty drugs, specialty pharmacies, and biosimilars in the United States. Presented at: International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 24th Annual International Meeting; May 18-22, 2019; New Orleans, Louisiana. Abstract PNS112.
Samsung Bioepis Report Signals Turning Point for US Biosimilars
May 1st 2025A wave of biosimilar approvals, aggressive pricing strategies, and a regulatory sea change are setting the stage for unprecedented momentum in the US biologics market, with 2025 already proving to be a landmark year in reshaping cost, access, and innovation across therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
FDA's Expanded Access: From Laetrile to Right to Try, Ethical Debates Over Early Drug Access
April 28th 2025Christopher T. Robertson, JD, PhD, reviewed the history and ethical landscape of providing access to drugs before FDA approval, highlighting the crucial role of clinical trials and ethical safeguards at the 2025 Festival of Biologics USA.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Unlocking Biosimilar Potential in Specialty Pharmacies With Legislative Support, Formulary Changes
April 24th 2025Sophia Humphreys, PharmD, MHA, BCBBS, emphasized that legislative support and formulary changes are crucial for overcoming unique challenges in specialty pharmacies and driving the growth of biosimilar adoption, which has significant cost saving potential in the next decade.
Decade of Biosimilars Yields $36 Billion in Savings and Strengthens Supply Chain
April 24th 2025Dracey Poore, MS, director of biosimilars and emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, highlighted that biosimilars saved $36 billion over the last decade by improving patient access and the supply chain, but continued education and a robust pipeline are crucial for future growth.