During Alex Azar’s Senate confirmation hearing earlier this month, he praised pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and argued that they should be expanded to negotiate for physician-administered drugs in Medicare Part B.
On Capitol Hill and in the media, discussion of Alex Azar, the new Secretary of HHS, has focused on his tenure at Eli Lilly. Azar’s opponents specifically point to drug price hikes during the 5 years he led the company’s US unit. However, while Azar’s track record as a pharmaceutical executive is significant, it is not his only troubling credential. The new head of our government’s largest domestic agency has publicly praised pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), yet another indicator that he will not be the patient advocate Americans desperately need.
The growing size and power of PBMs is a major reason why drug costs, particularly for biologics, have skyrocketed in recent years. As a rheumatologist in private practice, I see firsthand how PBM practices like clawbacks, step therapy, and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) make rheumatology treatments outrageously expensive and, in many cases, inaccessible. Sadly, PBMs are only getting bigger, more powerful, and more emboldened. We need advocates within the executive branch to stand up to PBMs and enact policies that remove barriers to treatment.
PBMs make billions on discounts, rebates, and fees from specialty drugs. List price, discount percentage, rebates, fees, and market share determine formulary placement—the holy grail of the pharmaceutical industry. The more money a drug makes for the PBM, the more prominent a spot it gets on its formulary. Therefore, the PBM system perversely incentivizes higher list prices. And the savings PBMs boast so much about negotiating with drugmakers? They are increasingly pocketing the money, passing little on to patients while reporting profits in the hundreds of billions. The PBM equation never factors in what is best for patients. Often, it would be cheaper to not use insurance at all.
The next HHS Secretary must acknowledge the PBM problem and advocate for policies that rein in their destructive, unfair practices. The influence of the 3 largest PBMs—Express Scripts, CVS Caremark, and Optum Rx—continues to grow and become a more powerful influence on Capitol Hill, at pharmacy counters, and doctors’ offices across the country. Without greater regulation and transparency in the drug pricing system, PBMs are going to continue raising costs for consumers and interfering with medical treatment.
During Azar’s Senate confirmation hearing earlier this month, he praised PBMs and argued that they should be expanded to negotiate for physician-administered drugs in Medicare Part B. Any doctor who prescribes biologics knows that this is simply not reality. PBMs enrich themselves while patients suffer the consequences of an opaque, convoluted drug pricing system. From the opioid epidemic to the fight over the Affordable Care Act, the country’s healthcare system faces deep, complicated challenges. The leader of HHS should be willing to speak truth to power and confront PBMs.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
Biosimilars in Action: Market Shifts, Legal Insights, and FDA Approvals
February 9th 2025In this episode of Not So Different, host Skylar Jeremias covers the latest biosimilar developments, including new FDA approvals, patent disputes, and biosimilar market trends shaping the health care landscape.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.
BioRationality: No More Biosimilars—Just Biogenerics
February 3rd 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that regulatory agencies should eliminate redundant clinical efficacy testing for biosimilars, recognizing them as "biogenerics" since physicochemical and in vitro biological comparisons are sufficient to ensure safety and efficacy.