The House Committee on Oversight and Reform held its first hearing into drug prices this week and received testimony that pointed to increased biosimilar competition as a part of the solution to the problem.
The House Committee on Oversight and Reform held its first hearing into drug prices this week and received testimony that pointed to increased biosimilar competition as a part of the solution to the problem.
In his opening statement, Committee chair Representative Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, said that drug companies’ price hikes to existing drugs and high launch prices for innovative products have created one of the biggest problems facing American families. Cummings called escalating prices unsustainable and a matter of life and death.
Among the experts providing testimony before the committee were Avik S.A. Roy, president of the Texas-based think tank The Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity.
Roy testified that prescription drug use is the third largest component of US healthcare spending, despite the fact that the United States leads other advanced global economies in use of unbranded generic drugs, made possible through the Hatch-Waxman Act and its provision of a pathway for a US generic marketplace. High prices for branded drugs, he said, now outweigh efficient generic utilization. Roy pointed to patient price insensitivity and monopolistic pricing—resulting from a lack of competition for branded products like biologics—as drivers of this growth.
According to Roy, “subtle differences between Hatch-Waxman and the [Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, BPCIA], highly favorable to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, have suffocated biosimilar competition.” In addition to questioning the longer exclusivity periods provided for biologics versus small-molecule drugs, Roy took issue with the fact that the BPCIA does not allow for automatic substitution of biosimilars at the pharmacy level unless they are granted interchangeable status by the FDA.
Roy also incorrectly stated that the BPCIA requires costly phase 3 clinical studies for biosimilars. The BPCIA does not, in fact, require phase 3 studies, and Coherus BioSciences’ pegfilgrastim biosimilar, Udenyca, was recently approved on the basis of analytical similarity studies as well as pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenicity studies.
Roy also pointed to patent issues—stating that patent litigation for biologics could exceed $100 million per product—and rebates paid by brand-name drug makers to pharmacy benefit managers as challenges to biosimilars.
Among Roy’s suggestions are reforms to the BPCIA that would allow for pharmacy-level substitution of biosimilars without interchangeable designations as well as government subsidies of legal costs for biosimilar developers who are challenging patents on originator products.
The committee also heard testimony from other experts, including Gerard F. Anderson, PhD, of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, who explained that drug makers may be gaming the Orphan Drug program to block competition for their products.
Similarly, Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH, of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, testified that patent exclusivities constitute government-granted monopolies on drugs and pointed to the example of Humira’s “patent thicket” that has forestalled US competition until 2023.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.