A new report from HHS has revealed that if the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) had been implemented in 2020, Medicare Part D beneficiaries could have saved a total of $734 million, averaging out to about $500 per member.
A new report from HHS has revealed that if the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) had been implemented in 2020, Medicare Part D and Part B beneficiaries could have saved a total of $734 million and $27 million, respectively, on insulin products.
When the IRA was passed in 2020, it included a provision to cap Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for reference and biosimilar insulin products to $35. A measure to extend the cap to patients covered by private insurance companies failed a Senate vote in August 2022. The Medicare insulin cap went into effect for Part D plans on January 1, 2023, and will go into effect for Part B plans beginning July 1, 2023.
On average, the researchers estimated that 1.5 million beneficiaries covered by Part B or Part D plans missed out on $500 in savings on insulin per member per year by the provision not being in effect in 2020. The report was conducted by the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
“The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to lowering health care costs and increasing access to high-quality, affordable health care, and the Inflation Reduction Act is helping us do just that…. Thanks to this historic law, people who get their insulin through Medicare won’t have to pay more than $35 for a month’s supply. No one should have to skip or ration their insulin because they can’t afford it,” said Xavier Becerra, HHS secretary, in a statement.
The states with the most people with Medicare Part D or Part B that will benefit from the new provision are Texas (n = 114,000), California (n = 108,000), and Florida (n = 90,000). However, the states that will likely have the highest average annual OOP savings per beneficiary are North Dakota ($805), Iowa ($725), and South Dakota ($725).
“Americans are seeing a strong economy where they live…they are seeing prices down at their pharmacies…. I am more confident than ever that America’s best days are ahead,” commented President Joe Biden in a statement on the new data.
The report sent to Congress examined the role that insulin plays in diabetes treatment and reviewed evidence on how the cost of insulin affects treatment adherence and downstream health consequences. Also included were some policy efforts that could improve the affordability of insulin.
In 2019, about 37% of insulin prescriptions filled by people with Medicare required cost-sharing that exceeded $35 per fill, of which 24% of fills exceeded $70 per fill.
A global survey from 2019 found that 25.9% of US respondents reported having rationed insulin in the previous year, nearly 20% higher than the percentage of respondents from other high-income countries. Additionally, a team at the Yale Diabetes Center found that 1 in 4 patients at the urban clinic at Yale reported some type of cost-related insulin underuse in the past 12 months, which included using less insulin than prescribed, not filling a prescription, and stopping insulin treatment completely.
The insulin OOP cap was originally proposed by CMS in March 2020 as part of the Part D Senior Savings Model, which former President Donald Trump signed an executive order to establish. The model was designed to save beneficiaries who take reference or biosimilar insulin products an average $446 in annual OOP costs for insulin, representing a 66% reduction in the average cost-sharing for insulin. The model was projected to generate $250 million in savings for the federal government over 5 years.
According to Becerra, the 1.5 million beneficiaries now impacted by the IRA’s cap do not include patients who already had their insulin costs capped at $35 through the Senior Savings Model. “Overall, we're looking at all Medicare beneficiaries who are taking insulin. And we're looking to see what they were actually paying out-of-pocket…. We're only counting the 1.5 million as folks who were paying more than $35 a month.”
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
How Community Oncologists Can Break Down Biosimilar Adoption Barriers
March 19th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Mark Guyot, senior director of unity provider engagement at McKesson, gives an overview of McKesson’s real-world analysis of community oncology practices and their use of biosimilars and offers advice on overcoming adoption barriers and expanding education efforts.
BioRationality: FDA Launches a New Opportunity to Remove Redundant Trials of Biosimilars
November 6th 2023The FDA introduced a plan to improve clinical trials, including a provision to possibly eliminate clinical efficacy testing for biologic products, which evidence has suggested may not be necessary, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.