The Innovation and Value Initiative (IVI) has updated its existing prototype economic model examining value among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapies to include biosimilars.
The Innovation and Value Initiative (IVI) has updated its existing prototype economic model examining value among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapies to include biosimilars, triple therapy, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, sarilumab, as well as updated treatment effect estimates based on additional randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence, and updated cost estimates.
The update follows a research brief released last month that questioned whether "conventional head-to-head cost-effectiveness analyses may not align with decision making in chronic disease," citing an analysis of JAK inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The issue of who gets to decide "value" in an era of ever-increasing drug costs has become a point of debate in recent years.
The IVI model, IVI-RA, is intended to help payers and other stakeholders identify high-value therapies by simulating the lifetime costs and benefits of different strategies for treating patients with moderate-to-severe RA. IVI said its latest research highlights the type of additional questions important for patients, providers, and payers that make value assessments; it also incorporates real-world data.
The model is designed to examine a variety of factors with the inclusion of real-world patient data, including:
IVI will continue to update the model in 2020 to include the duration of maintenance treatment and the impact of prior treatment.
“Value assessments must be relevant to real-world decision makers and can be vastly improved by an ability to showcase how real patients experience disease,” says Jennifer Bright, IVI’s executive director, in a statement. “We recognize that our open-source model is just a start, which is why we are calling for partners to work with us, sharing real-world data on outcomes so we can answer even more questions. Our aim is to perfect this model to answer questions truly important to patients, providers, and payers.”
IVI-RA was the first disease-specific economic model developed within IVI’s Open-Source Value Project (OSVP), which serves as a laboratory for developing next-generation economic models in an open-source environment. The model was initially released in November 2017.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Similar Between Adalimumab-adbm, Reference Product in VOLTAIRE-RA Study
September 28th 2024A summary of research written by Vibeke Strand, MD, clinical professor in division of immunology/rheumatology at Stanford University School of Medicine, gave an overview of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the VOLTAIRE-RA trial.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
AAM Report: Despite Massive Savings, Patient OOP Costs on Biosimilars, Generics Remain High, Part 2
September 24th 2024Part 2 of our series diving into the Association for Accessible Medicines' (AAM) latest report discusses that while generics and biosimilars saved $445 billion in 2023, their potential is hindered by high patient costs, drug shortages, and ineffective policies, underscoring the need for reforms to fully realize their benefits.
BioRationality—The Missing Rationality in Biosimilar Discussions and the Path Forward
September 23rd 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, critiques the irrationality surrounding biosimilars, suggesting that regulatory changes and cost reductions in manufacturing could make biosimilars as affordable as generic drugs.