John Gabrielson, senior vice president at JSR Life Sciences and head of Similis Bio, talked about the challenges associated with launching a business venture like Similis Bio and how Similis Bio's business model differs from other biosimilar developers and their spin-offs.
John Gabrielson, senior vice president at JSR Life Sciences and head of Similis Bio, talked about the challenges associated with launching a business venture like Similis Bio and how Similis Bio's business model differs from other biosimilar developers and their spin-offs.
Transcript
Similis Bio is a relatively new company in the biosimilars game, being a biopharmaceutical business division of JSR Life Sciences. However, they are not the only new players—Novartis has announced spinning off Sandoz into a separate company and Merck has done the same with Organon. How is Similis Bio different from other biopharmaceutical companies and what are some of the challenges associated with launching a new company in this space?
Gabrielson: Yeah, Similis Bio actually differs quite a bit from the spin-offs you mentioned. One thing, Similis is focused exclusively on preclinical CMC [chemistry, manufacturing, and control] development of biosimilars. So, this includes things like analytical development, cell line and process development, and formulation development. From there, we find partners to take the products forward through clinical development and commercialization.
The other thing I wanted to mention, we aim to introduce new efficiencies into the biosimilar development paradigm, like multi-use data and purpose-built information packages. So, I think that also distinguishes us.
You also asked about challenges. Launching a new venture in the biosimilar space does have unique challenges. It's a rapidly growing sector of the industry and it's a highly competitive one. The market's crowded and we believe it's also, at this time at least, a very inefficient marketplace. And that's an area where I think we can really help.
We're reimagining what biosimilar development can look like in a global marketplace where the winning products will be both cost competitive, and have top tier quality.
Similis Bio’s business model functions by helping biopharmaceutical companies navigate the drug development process, improve efficiency, and reduce cost. How does Similis Bio work with other companies to achieve those goals and what does Similis Bio look for in a company partnership?
Gabrielson: Yeah, I appreciate the question on the business model and the partnership. So, first of all, our business model really seeks to do 2 things. We want to make biosimilar development faster and make it more cost effective.
We accelerate development by creating made to order assets ready to license eliminating, in some cases, up to 2 years of preclinical development and allowing companies to start nonclinical and clinical development immediately. We make biosimilar development more cost effective by making noncompetitive reference product information available to companies on a nonexclusive basis.
As it relates to our business model, we develop biosimilar products that are highly similar to the reference products and ready to enter clinical trials. Compared to novel biologics, biosimilars achieve most of their value during preclinical development before even 1 human is dosed. So, in this way, we're positioning Similis as a value creation engine for biosimilars.
I think a good partnership leverages the strengths and resources of each party. So, we look for companies with a long-term mindset, who value quality and with the resources to take the preclinical clinical biosimilars that we develop through clinical development and, eventually, marketing authorization. We need to have aligned values with our partners, and notably, this would include a mission to make high-quality biologics globally accessible.
HHS Praises Biosimilars Savings but Opportunities to Reduce Part B Spending Remain
November 28th 2023Although biosimilars have already generated savings for Medicare Part B programs and beneficiaries, opportunities for substantial reductions in spending remain, according to a report from the HHS.
Eye on Pharma: Adalimumab Updates; New Eylea Biosimilar Lawsuit; Canada Gains Stelara Biosimilar
November 22nd 2023Several companies make moves to further their adalimumab biosimilars, Regeneron sues Celltrion over biosimilar for Eylea (aflibercept), and Health Canada grants marketing authorization for biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab).
Biosimilar Business Roundup for October 2023—Podcast Edition
November 5th 2023On this episode, we discuss the biggest news to come out of October 2023, including 3 regulatory approvals, 2 complete response letters, and new data and industry insights that have the potential to impact the entire US biosimilar industry.
AMCP Nexus: Panelists Share Current Scope of Biosimilar Industry
October 26th 2023Panelists at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus meeting chronicled the current state of the US biosimilar market, including current policies impacting the market, recent regulatory decisions, and the developing arguments around requirements for clinical efficacy studies.
Report: Conflicting Guidelines, Rebate Walls Are Major Factors Determining Biosimilar Uptake
October 24th 2023Samsung Bioepis’ most recent biosimilar market report identified inconsistent medical guidelines, challenges with access and rebates, and acute vs chronic treatment duration as major factors influencing biosimilar uptake in the United States.