Investigators tapped health system data to conduct an observational, real-world comparison of bevacizumab (Mvasi) vs the reference product (Avastin).
An ongoing real-world observational study of bevacizumab biosimilar (Mvasi) vs originator (Avastin) has demonstrated comparable safety and effectiveness for a cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in a US integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente), according to a poster presentation at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2021 meeting.
Patients were enrolled in the study based on initiation of biosimilar bevacizumab between July 1, 2019 and March 30, 2020 (n = 232) or initiation of bevacizumab reference product between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2018 (n = 1128).
The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and mortality, and secondary end points were treatment persistence, defined as the total number of doses received, time between first and last dose, and the proportion of patients who switched to the reference product. Other secondary end points were the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and hospitalizations and emergency department visits of any type.
Investigators said OS for the bevacizumab biosimilar cohort (82.8%) was noninferior to that of the reference product group (81.7%), based on a 4% margin of acceptability. They said that between the 2 groups, there were no significant differences in treatment persistence, SAEs, or hospitalizations and emergency department visits.
They said the study successfully captured real-world outcomes for patients treated with bevacizumab biosimilar immediately after the product was launched. They also said a strength of the study was its use of a large historical control group. Limitations of the study included that it was observational, which is not considered as reliable as a clinical study, and that it had a relatively short follow-up period, investigators said.
Reference
Pham C, Chiu T, Ekinci E, et al. Real-world evaluation of biosimilar bevacizumab-awwb versus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in a U.S. integrated healthcare delivery system. Presented at: AMCP 2021; April 12-16, 2021. Accessed April 23, 2021. https://amcpannual2021.pathable.co/organizations/7nYnTLzA3j3JZpccw#/?limit=10&sortByFields[0]=isPinned&sortByFields[1]=lastActivityAt&sortByOrders[0]=-1&sortByOrders[1]=-1&uid=pAcLoMw6BXog7ypr6
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.