Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) recently reintroduced bipartisan legislation aimed at bringing down prescription drug costs.
Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) recently reintroduced bipartisan legislation aimed at bringing down prescription drug costs.
The legislation, now titled “Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act,” was first introduced to Congress in January 2017, then titled “Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act.” The aim of the bill was originally to prohibit brand name drug companies from compensating generic drug companies to delay the entry of a generic into the market, an action referred to in the industry as a “pay-for-delay” deal. Since the original introduction of the bill, the aim has expanded to include prohibiting biologics manufacturers from compensating biosimilar developers to delay the entry of competitor products into the market.
“When brand-name, generic, and biologic drug makers enter into agreements to keep more affordable medicines out of the marketplace, all of us are left to pay the price. Competition among drug makers is critical to lowering the price of prescription medications,” said Grassley in a statement. “Generics and biosimilar drugs offer the same benefits as brand name drugs, but often at a lower price. Our bill will curb the anti-competitive pay-for-delay tactics that artificially inflate prices for patients and prevent access to more affordable alternatives.”
The bill is just one in a series of recently introduced items of legislation that seek to address the high cost of prescription drugs. In fact, the legislation is similar to a bill introduced by Congressman John Sarbanes, D-Maryland, in the House of Representatives in July 2018, titled the “Biosimilars Competition Act of 2018,” of which some key components were subsequently passed in September 2018.
Sarbanes’ bill required both biologic and biosimilar developers to report agreements to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) if they keep lower-cost drugs off the market. According to a 2013 report from the FTC, cited in the introduction of the bill, in 2005, 3 pay-for-delay deals were made between brand name and generic manufacturers. In 2012, that number rose to 40 agreements among brand name and generic manufacturers.
In support of the Biosimilars Competition Act of 2018, the Congressional Budget Office released an unofficial estimate that the Act would save an estimated $100 million from 2019 to 2028. These savings could then help to pay for other bills, such as the “Patient Right to Know Drug Prices Act,” which passed in the Senate in September 2018. The bill eliminated so-called pharmacy “gag clauses,” which are contractual agreements between pharmacy benefit managers and pharmacies that prevent pharmacists from informing consumers if their medication is cheaper to pay for out-of-pocket rather than going through his or her insurance.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
The Trump Administration’s Drug Price Actions and Why US Prices Are Already Sky-High
May 17th 2025While the Trump administration’s latest executive order touts sweeping drug price cuts through international benchmarking, the broader pharmaceutical pricing crisis in the US reveals a far more complex web of development costs, profit incentives, and absent price controls—raising the question of whether any single policy, including potential drug tariffs, can truly untangle it.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Targeted Reimbursement Encourages Oncology Biosimilar Use
May 7th 2025Incentivizing physicians with modest financial bonuses may seem like a small step, but in Japan’s outpatient oncology setting, it helped push trastuzumab biosimilars toward broader adoption, demonstrating how even limited reimbursement reforms can reshape prescribing behavior under the right conditions.