Health Canada looks to lower the maximum price for drugs, but doing so could delay patient access, warns Montreal Economic Institute.
Health Canada is looking to lower the maximum prices for drugs through regulation. However, if the agency achieves this goal, it could actually put the health of Canadians at risk, according to a viewpoint published by the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI).
“In wanting to reduce the prices of drugs, Health Canada runs the risk of reducing access to drugs instead,” says Mathieu Bédard, economist at the MEI and author of the piece.
Earlier this year, Health Canada announced a consultation that aims to reduce the price of new drugs as they enter the country. This consultation proposed 5 main amendments to the current policy as follows:
However, in looking at the aftermath of similar decisions in other countries where drug prices have dipped too low, these measures have resulted in hurting patients rather than helping them by delaying patient access to new therapies, according to Bédard.
“In New Zealand, a country often cited as an example for its drug prices, the public system’s access to treatments for diseases like diabetes, cancer, and high cholesterol can be delayed by more than 10 years compared with Canada,” said Bédard, because pharmaceutical companies first introduce innovative drugs in the markets where the price of drugs takes into consideration the amount of research that went into development, as well as ensuring a return on investment.
“Currently, Canada ranks very high in terms of access to new drugs, but if this balance is upset by a reform that lowers prices, the country could wind up at the bottom of the pack,” says Bédard. “When it comes to delays in launching new drugs, Canada is the second fastest after Japan, with an average time to launch of just 90 days after approval, versus nearly 300 in Portugal and over 400 in New Zealand.”
“The interests of patients are better served when drug prices are at a level that allows for pharmaceutical research to be financed. When prices are set artificially low through the usage of regulation, as Health Canada recently suggested doing, there is a risk that patients will end up paying the price. Before intervening even more in this market, public decision-makers should appreciate the balance that underpins this access,” said Michel Kelly-Gagnon, president and CEO of MEI.
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Natalizumab in the US
Projected savings from biosimilar natalizumab were $452,611 over 3 years, driven by decreased drug acquisition costs and a utilization shift from reference to biosimilar natalizumab.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for April 2024—Podcast Edition
May 5th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, The Center for Biosimilars® glances back at all the major biosimilar policy updates from April, including 2 FDA approvals, 1 European approval, and several insights into possible policy changes from the Festival of Biologics USA conference.
Hesitancy in MENA Nations to Adopt WHO Biosimilar Guidelines Hinders Market Development
July 17th 2024The World Health Organization’s (WHO) new guidelines for biosimilar approvals aim to save time and money for manufacturers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but hesitancy among nations to adopt the guidelines is stifling market development of biosimilars.
BioRationality: Time to Get Rid of PBMs if Biosimilars Are to Succeed
July 15th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, discusses the challenges with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that plague the biosimilar industry and new legislation that attempts to reform their practices and encourage biosimilar adoption.