Health Canada looks to lower the maximum price for drugs, but doing so could delay patient access, warns Montreal Economic Institute.
Health Canada is looking to lower the maximum prices for drugs through regulation. However, if the agency achieves this goal, it could actually put the health of Canadians at risk, according to a viewpoint published by the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI).
“In wanting to reduce the prices of drugs, Health Canada runs the risk of reducing access to drugs instead,” says Mathieu Bédard, economist at the MEI and author of the piece.
Earlier this year, Health Canada announced a consultation that aims to reduce the price of new drugs as they enter the country. This consultation proposed 5 main amendments to the current policy as follows:
However, in looking at the aftermath of similar decisions in other countries where drug prices have dipped too low, these measures have resulted in hurting patients rather than helping them by delaying patient access to new therapies, according to Bédard.
“In New Zealand, a country often cited as an example for its drug prices, the public system’s access to treatments for diseases like diabetes, cancer, and high cholesterol can be delayed by more than 10 years compared with Canada,” said Bédard, because pharmaceutical companies first introduce innovative drugs in the markets where the price of drugs takes into consideration the amount of research that went into development, as well as ensuring a return on investment.
“Currently, Canada ranks very high in terms of access to new drugs, but if this balance is upset by a reform that lowers prices, the country could wind up at the bottom of the pack,” says Bédard. “When it comes to delays in launching new drugs, Canada is the second fastest after Japan, with an average time to launch of just 90 days after approval, versus nearly 300 in Portugal and over 400 in New Zealand.”
“The interests of patients are better served when drug prices are at a level that allows for pharmaceutical research to be financed. When prices are set artificially low through the usage of regulation, as Health Canada recently suggested doing, there is a risk that patients will end up paying the price. Before intervening even more in this market, public decision-makers should appreciate the balance that underpins this access,” said Michel Kelly-Gagnon, president and CEO of MEI.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.