Maria Manley, LLM, a life sciences expert and London-based partner with Sidley Austin, provides a deep-dive look at the complexities of Brexit and how it is likely to challenge the biologics industry.
In an interview with The Center for Biosimilars®, Maria Manley, LLM, a London-based partner with Sidley Austin, explored the complex challenges that Brexit, which marked the United Kingdom’s official exit from the European Union, has presented regulators and the biopharmaceutical industry.
In preparation, pharmaceutical companies have had to ensure that they were properly registered and domiciled so that they could continue doing business in the United Kingdom and Europe.
The United Kingdom and the European Union established a free trade agreement without tariffs and quotas. However, border checks and product movement present problems in Northern Ireland, which is a part of the United Kingdom but is still allowed to follow some EU rules. Manley said there are 2 sets of litigation applying to these jurisdictions, which add to the complexities of Brexit.
On the upside, the United Kingdom has agreed to acknowledge temporarily the marketing authorizations for pharmaceutical drugs that were previously approved in the European Union, ensuring that any impacts on drug supply are minimal.
Some of the regulatory changes for the biologics industry includes an end to animal toxicology studies. Further, comparative efficacy studies will be required only if the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency deems that there is a sufficient reason.
A new approval pathway for biologics was designed with the intention of simplifying the current system and accelerating the process to get innovative medicines on the market. Manley said that the United Kingdom may be willing to accept real world evidence in support of product approval applications.
Additionally, Manley discussed the “rolling review” feature added to the United Kingdom’s medicines approval process, which was created to enable applications to move through regulatory review quickly. This review format will apply to novel biologics, including biosimilars.
Julie Reed: Why 2024 Is Important for Biosimilars
April 17th 2024Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, showcases how the biosimilar industry is expected to develop throughout 2024, including major policy changes and hope for continued improvement in market share for adalimumab biosimilars.
Decoding the Patent Puzzle: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Biosimilars
March 17th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Ha Kung Wong, JD, an intellectual patent attorney and partner at Venable LLP, details the confusing landscape that is the US patent system and how it can be improved to help companies overcome barriers to biosimilar competition.
Alvotech’s Stelara Biosimilar, Selarsdi, Receives FDA Approval
April 16th 2024Alvotech’s Selarsdi (ustekinumab-aekn), a biosimilar referencing Stelara (ustekinumab), gained FDA approval, making it the second ustekinumab biosimilar and second for the company to be given the green light for the American market.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: MHRA's Procedure Enables Automatic Registration of Biosimilars Approved Elsewhere
March 18th 2024Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, explains how the new international recognition procedure under the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) could expand biosimilar access within the United Kingdom, in his latest column.